Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 February 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 24[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 24, 2010

Castle Vale JKS F.C.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete as unopposed nomination. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redirect - these are two separate football clubs. 86.177.238.253 (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

3rd Infantry (Spearhead) Division / 3rd Infantry Division[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unlikely redirect 70.29.210.242 (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - this phraseology (either with or without spaces around the slash) occurs online only in Wikipedia. Either the first part or the second part will be search, not both... and each is covered with a redirect to the appropriate place. No one will miss this one. B.Wind (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

3rd Infantry (Spearhead) Division[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn (nominator close).

Delete - unlikely redirect 70.29.210.242 (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep this title is used in the title of the Division's official website [1] and on other Philippine government websites. Thryduulf (talk) 16:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Weezer's fourth studio album[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete as unopposed nomination. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely obscure redirect title and it is a confusing and incorrect redirect (it was created for the sixth album, not the fourth). There is no history of notable value. Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 11:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Weezer's sixth album[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is an extremely obscure name for the actual article. The information in the history isn't even relevant because it was based off information provided by www.albumsix.com, which was revealed to be a hoax, as explained and referenced in the actual Weezer (2008 album) article. So the redirect and its history is really not useful to Wikipedia at all. Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 11:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep reasonably high traffic for a redirect (50-60 hits a month), and is not an unlikely search term given the albumsix website - although this was a hoax it was a notable hoax. Thryduulf (talk) 16:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure if this is the place to debate "notable hoax," and I don't mean this uncivilly, but the fact that users got away with using a single source of information with no previous history of reliability, let alone existence, makes me question the editors' notability, not the hoax. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 04:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_24&oldid=1091465520"