Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 August 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 2, 2010

Sara Buxton (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. Target is not a disambiguation page. Closing as CSD G6. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:45, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect from (disambiguation). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - this redirect was, properly, replaced by a hatnote on the target. It is, consequently, redundant. This is not a case where WP:INTDABLINK applies. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Sarah Buxton (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. Target is not a disambiguation page. Closing as CSD G6. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:45, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect from (disambiguation). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:27, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - this redirect was, properly, replaced by a hatnote on the target. It is, consequently, redundant. This is not a case where WP:INTDABLINK applies. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Breezy Point, Nevada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as vandalism.--Kubigula (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot see a reason for a placename in Nevada to redirect to a place in a different state. Googling seems to indicate that there's no such place as Breezy Point, NV. Mangoe (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as misleading. The creator is a blocked user, well known in this project for a long history of creating bizarre redirects. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Stretchable anus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Anal_fissure#Anal dilation (or dilatation). —fetch·comms 20:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I don't think this one needs much explanation.... Jimzah32 (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Melon hurphey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Deleted - Log entry: 05:52, August 3, 2010 User:RHaworth deleted "Melon hurphey" ‎ (G3: Vandalism) --Taelus (Talk) 14:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No apparent connection between term and any link on target disambig page. bd2412 T 19:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete - meaningless term so far as I can see. No Ghits. Sole contribution by this user. Probably petty vandalism. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Low Corean[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete all. Ruslik_Zero 18:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as confusing - there are no Korean dialects with these names. In addition, these terms are too general to be useful. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Train2104 (talk) 01:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all listed by the nominator and Train2104. Confusing redirects which promote a misleading analogy e.g. to High German languages/Low German languages. Neither Korean dialects nor old languages of the Korean peninsula are classified in this way. cab (call) 06:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Incidentally I might see the case for recreating "High Korean" (not any of the others) as a disambiguation page --- "high" referring either to:
      1. "high dialect" i.e. prestige dialect (of which Korean has two, namely Seoul dialect or Pyongan dialect); I see a few usages in (non-linguistic) academic papers in this sense, e.g. [1][2]
      2. "high register" of Korean, i.e. the top levels of Korean honorifics
      3. Goguryeo language, since "Goguryeo" is very occasionally (mis?)-translated as "High Koryo"
But the existing redirect definitely doesn't make sense, and I think even this suggestion is a bit of a stretch. cab (call) 06:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Colin aines[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by Anthony.bradbury as WP:CSD R3. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect created because of a typographical error... ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 17:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as R3 and tagged as such. Recent, implausible typos don't need to come here. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:59, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Netwrok router[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept & tagged as misspelling. No consensus for deletion. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this misspelling. Network router redirect exists. Kvng (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - entirely plausible typo as shown by the fact it gets hits every month. I frequently reveres letter myself. Doesn't meet WP:RFD#DELETE, long-standing redirect whose deletion may break links in external sites and entirely harmless. No reason to delete. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep—reasonable-enough redirect, common-enough typo. –Grondemar 16:41, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this is not a difficult name and people who speak English will either not make this mistake or fix it themselves Hekerui (talk) 19:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Paul Kont[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. There is no content about him at the target. As he's linked to from at least one list (and mentioned in another), a red link to encourage article creation is a better solution then sending people where they won't find any information. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't figure out what he has to do with the movie (his name does not appear in the article) and this redirect thus should be deleted. He is apparently a notable composer (appearing on the music encyclopedia topics list) and should have his own article. I suspect this was created as vandalism, as the user has since been banned. Rigadoun (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - definitely not vandalism - he wrote some of the score - see here. He's in the page, now :-) Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • It would still be better to have an article on him. bd2412 T 15:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep - I agree with BD2412 but I haven't found sufficient reliable sources, as yet, that could stand up a page. If someone can point me towards some good material I'm happy to write one. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Redirects to: Roundabout dog[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept per Bridgeplayer rationale. Once those kept, no reason to delete the transliterations. Also, none were tagged with RFD so any possible users would be unlikely to know about this debate and weigh in. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all these 6 Swedish variant redirects (from 2006) of the Swedish name "rondellhund" (redirect=Roundabout dog), which are viewed only 5 times each per month, probably in curiosity as being rare, non-English words ("hundarna" is Swedish plural of "hund" for dog). I have notified the Bot which created some of them. Wikid77 (talk) 05:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_August_2&oldid=1138577159"