Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 April 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 9, 2010

Camp rock 2 soundtrack[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:44, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In existence for only a few days, this was originally a list of songs duplicating the list in the current target article. Original version was prodded; I slapped a {{db-a10}} tag on it because of the defective name and the cut'n'paste of the playlist. Both speedy and prod tags were superseded by an editor who created the current redirect. It seems a highly unlikely redirect (note: I considered the option of restoring the original version and taking to AfD, but it seems most probable that either it would be redirected or deleted there as well as here. This simply saves the step of a second consideration of the redirect).B.Wind (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created the redirect with the idea that "camp rock 2 soundtrack" is a likely Google search, but I really don't care. Icewedge (talk) 05:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Deejay (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless redirect masquerading as a disambiguation page. noq (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as target does not disambiguate, nor is disambiguation needed anywhere with the term. B.Wind (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Recently created with no incoming links.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 11:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Red Spider Revolution[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There does not seem to be any indication that the Kyrgyz protests of April 7, 2010 are referred to by this phrase. Hux (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete If it's referred to it somewhere it's obscure. This google: [1] tells the story. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 04:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nothing more than a protologism at best. Thryduulf (talk) 11:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I clicked on NativeForeigner's link expecting to read the obscure story of why some riots in Kyrgyzstan have been called the "Red Spider Revolution" -- ah, but Google tells many tales.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

CC-BY-SA-3.0[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Creative Commons licenses ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CC By SA is also a licence outside of wikipedia. This is an internamespace redirect. I was thinking it should probably link to Creative Commons Licenses, What are your thoughts? NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 01:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Creative Commons licenses per NativeForeigner. Diti the penguin — 07:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 11:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep I put this one in, not for use in articles, which have close to 0 links for this, but on talk and project pages to make an easy to type and refer to for newcomers link. I use it mainly for people who give invalid licenses. This is a very specific link to the license that is valid for use in Wikipedia. Linking it to the Creative Commons licenses article would create confusion to new people who could easily pick the wrong one. I would like to have a CC-BY-3.0 too but it has no sensible target. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom (and to avoid a cross namespace redirect). The current target can be linked from a "See also" section in the proposed new target (if it isn't already done so). B.Wind (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as suggested by nominator. This looks like a bad CNR to me, and as pointed out previously there are many shortcuts that are alternatives to this, and probably much shorter shortcuts in the projectspace too. --Taelus (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as above. We must always prefer to use reasonable search terms as a part of the encyclopedia rather than for the convenience of some editors. — Gavia immer (talk) 00:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per above. –Grondemar 05:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_April_9&oldid=1148047705"