Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 April 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 29, 2010

Wikipedia:AfD/TB[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This should be deleted. It's confusing to have WP:AfD/T jump to today's AfDs, but WP:AfD/TB jump to this specific AfD from 2006 John of Reading (talk) 20:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I can see no reason for this redirect to exist, especially not in 2010. –Grondemar 22:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There are plenty of articles for deletion target articles which start with a "T" and a second word starting with a "B". Décembër21st2012Freâk Talk at 23:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weakish Delete I agree with the above reasons, but according to the first edit, this was created to avoid using the person's name in a mailing list. It was four years ago, give or take, to be honest I doubt this'll disrupt anything, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - it would be improper for a deletion discussion to have its own short cut. Since the discussion concluded in 2006 (in a deletion of the nominated article), there is no reason for maintaining the short cut. B.Wind (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Vampire sex novel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Vampire literature (non admin close). B.Wind (talk) 03:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that Twilight is the only such novel, and as such this redirect could potentially lead readers down the wrong path. - Mobius Clock 16:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Klamydia (singer) and others[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by User:Taelus CSD G10. (non admin close) B.Wind (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all three were created by one user, and are probably attack redirects (judging by the user's name and the fact that all three articles are about entrants in the 2008 Eurovision contest). There could be a case for redirecting Klamydia (singer) to Klamydia, but it's a somewhat unlikely search term. Same goes for Herpise to Herpes - Mobius Clock 16:18, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I deleted all of them under CSD:G10, as they strike me as plain as day attack pages, also violate the BLP policy. --Taelus (talk) 16:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not closing yet incase anyone does think Herpise should redirect to Herpes and such, but obviously the BLP violations couldn't sit there for 7 days. --Taelus (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I did wonder about G10, but I decided against tagging as the pages weren't attacking the subjects directly. I'll know for the future that G10 applies to this kind of thing and avoid clogging up RfD! - Mobius Clock 16:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Badoer FZ[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting deletion. This page was created about a Formula Zero team supposedly being set up by Luca Badoer. It was then judged not notable enough for an article and redirected. The problem is that Badoer FZ is a hoax. A similar hoax relying on the same, self-published source, http://www.badoer.co.nr/ was deleted at Badoer f1 some time ago. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Oceanic whitetip reef shark[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is an Oceanic whitetip shark and a Whitetip reef shark, but there is no such thing as an 'Oceanic whitetip reef shark', so I see no point in keeping this redirect. The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Auditory memory[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was kept as nominator did not advocate the deletion of the redirect, just the creation of a new article. There is nothing to prevent such a creation. Title has been listed at WP:Requested articles (non admin close). B.Wind (talk) 03:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auditory memory consists of a wide range of related and scientifically technical topics of which Echoic memory is only a single element, there is a need create a new or expanded Auditory memory article to include all of the related auditory memory topics including a summary of and link to Echoic memory. dolfrog (talk) 10:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to delete the redirect to start an article on auditory memory—just overwrite the redirect and write away! –Grondemar 22:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_April_29&oldid=1141906765"