Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 November 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 11, 2008

Criticism of Islam/Sub article:Alleged intolerance of criticism → Criticism of Islam[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, useless.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete most highly unlikely search item with a title that violates WP:NAME, making it look like a badly-named subpage of the target. The sooner it can be put out of its misery, the better. B.Wind (talk) 01:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Krishnamurthy Institute of Algology → Algae fuel[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete as R3. Alexf(talk) 12:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not mentioned on target, only external link, Wikipedia is not a directory 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Renewable energy in California → Wind power in California[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Renewable energy in the United States. There aren't really alternative articles for disambiguation. The new target talks about California wind power as well as other renewable energy sources so it serves the same function as disambiguating by getting the user to relevant information of interest. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

California has solar and hydro resources as well 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate with links to both resources. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 12:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is an interesting one. My first reaction was also to disambiguate. But when I look at the target article, it seems to me like that article should be deleted (or at least merged away) as more news-like than encyclopedic. I suppose disambiguation is the right answer while we decide what to do with the target... Rossami (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's clear that this should be a standalone article (as should the one below). Disambiguation on a state-by-state basis is actually a bit on the awkward side; instead, retarget to Renewable energy until the Renewable energy in California article is written. 147.70.242.40, temporarily at 147.70.242.41 (talk) 18:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Renewable energy in Texas → Wind power in Texas[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Renewable energy in the United States. There aren't really alternative articles for disambiguation. The new target talks about Texas wind power as well as other renewable energy sources so it serves the same function as disambiguating by getting the user to relevant information of interest. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Texas has solar and hydro resources as well 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wind powered vehicles → sailboat[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Wind-powered vehicle. While the target has some issues, this is a minor variation on that article's title so re-targeting is the most appropriate choice. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are many types of wind powered vehicles 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • This really should be a standalone article on wind-powered modes of transportation (iceboats, catamarans, etc.), but is this one of those cases in which a redlink is preferable? Since the only link to this redirect is from green transport, an article in dire need of work, I'm quite tempted to say delete for now. 147.70.242.40, temporarily at 147.70.242.41 (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't think there's enough content that we could write an stand-alone article on this topic without resorting to original research or synthesis. Perhaps a disambiguation page could survive but if no one feels like converting it to that format before this discussion runs out, deletion would be equally useful to our readers. I agree that the one inbound link provides zero evidence of the project's need for a page on this topic. Rossami (talk) 22:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate with above links. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 01:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Wind power or Disambiguate as above. The redirect made me laugh, though. --UsaSatsui (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Capacitive technology → Tablet PC[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The two are not logically connected. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Alsons Aquaculture Corporation → Sarangani Bay[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted by MacGyverMagic as CSD R3. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Company redirecting to a geographical feature, not mentioned there either. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Fuel efficient vehicle → Electric vehicle[edit]

The result of the debate was deleted by Rmhermen (talk · contribs). Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 01:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These are not logically connected, an electric vehicle can waste electricity, and a vehicle that does not run on electricity can be efficient 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Renewable energy power plant → Photovoltaics[edit]

The result of the debate was deleted by Rmhermen (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 02:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Solar is not the only type of renewable. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Cost-competitive → Cost competitiveness of fuel sources[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 01:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are other cost competitveness factors besides fuel 70.55.84.27 (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The concept of "cost-competitiveness" is broader than the mere example of fuel. The phrase itself, however, is self-evident. Maybe soft-redirect to Wiktionary if a suitable target can be found. Rossami (talk) 01:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Agree with the above reasoning, the source describes a more general concept than the target. Nsk92 (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Low-cost electric vehicle → Automobile industry in India[edit]

The result of the debate was deleted by Rmhermen (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 02:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

one has nothing to do with the other 70.55.84.27 (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Transparent screen → Organic light-emitting diode[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted by MacGyverMagic as expired PROD. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect makes no sense at all. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy-delete. I can not find even a tenuous connection in this case. Rossami (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Take newly created dab page to AfD as it seems questionable (top line is dubious at best; bottom line needs a stretch to make it a reach). Unfortunately, the speedy was declined, but the dab page doesn't appear to be valid, either. 147.70.242.40, temporarily at 147.70.242.41 (talk) 20:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Bendable → Mobile phone[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Articulation. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect makes no sense 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Car transportation → Car dealership[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete as R3. Alexf(talk) 12:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Smart lighting → Light-emitting diode[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete as R3. Alexf(talk) 12:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These two terms are unrelated to each other. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

G24i → Dye-sensitized solar cell[edit]

The result of the debate was deleted by Tone (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 02:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

term not found at target 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

G24 Innovations → Dye-sensitized solar cell[edit]

The result of the debate was deleted by Redvers (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 02:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

term not found at target 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.


Global Photonic Energy → Organic photovoltaic[edit]

The result of the debate was deleted by Tone (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 11:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

company name redirecting to generic term 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Screen-printable ink → ESL ElectroScience[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 01:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

blatant advertising NPOV violation 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Possibly alternately redirect to screen-printing, except our article there makes no mention of any particularities of the ink used in that process, so a redirect would be confusing to the reader. --Delirium (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Bulk silicon → solar cell[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 01:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These two terms are unrelated 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Quite unlikely redirect. --Delirium (talk) 09:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Flexible photovoltaic → Helianthos[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11: blatant advertising. I deleted this on noticing it. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 21:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

there are other flexible PV projects besides this one 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Flexible photovoltaics → Helianthos[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11: blatant advertising. I deleted this on noticing it. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 21:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this is blatant promotion of a specific flexi-PV project 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wide area electronics → Solar cell[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy (R3) (closed by another Admin). Alexf(talk) 18:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are other types of wide area electronics, such as communications 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Transparent electronics → Thin film[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are other types of transparent electronics, like some organics, and vacuum tubes 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Seems unlikely that most people searching for "transparent electronics" will want an article on thin films. --Delirium (talk) 09:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Off gassing → Emission Reduction Unit[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Outgassing. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Off gassing does not refer to ERU, and is factually wrong to redirect it in such a way. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Multifunctional building panel → Building integrated photovoltaics[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. Red link preferable to misleading redirect. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BIPV are only one class of these panels 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • So use the editing tools that you already possess and write a disambiguation or an article documenting all of the other classes. You don't need an administrator to fix this problem. You need to write content. Uncle G (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Crystalline PV cell → Crystalline silicon[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Photovoltaic module. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photovoltatic cells are not a topic covered in this article, and crystalline PV cells do not necessarily use silicon. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've retargeted it to Photovoltaic module... but it's not all that likely a search term. 76.66.192.6 (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Optical concentration → Magnifying glass[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

optical concentrators are also other things besides magnifying glasses, which we have articles on, particularly in optical communications technology 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • So write an article on the subject telling readers this. You have the editing tools. You don't need administrative tools to fix this problem. The goal is to make the encyclopaedia better, which you won't achieve by not writing the things that you claim are missing from the encyclopaedia and not improving the parts of the encyclopaedia that are incomplete. Uncle G (talk) 11:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can think of nothing encyclopedic to say about "optical concentration" except the self-evident "things that concentrate light". The redirect was created by an editor who has exhausted my ability to assume good faith. Given the user's pattern of contributions, this is better returned to a redlink. Rossami (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Refined silicon → Wafer (electronics)[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Silicon#Purification. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These two concepts are not logically equivalent, and one is not a subset of the other. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Home improvement store → The Home Depot[edit]

The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Hardware store. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

blatant advertising NPOV violation 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Luscious Garage → Automobile repair shop[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. Alexf(talk) 12:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NN garage redirect to generic article, advertising, WP:NOT a directory 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Cost parity → Photovoltaics[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete as implausible redirect. ... discospinster talk 20:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One has nothing to do with the other 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Can't see any plausible article at that location, since it's a really generic concept of costs being, well, on par. Not sure a redirect to cost would be particularly useful either. --Delirium (talk) 08:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Plastic foam → Microcellular plastic[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the only type of foam plastic, not even close. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 06:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • So turn it into a disambiguation for the other types, or even an article on the subject. Why do you think that deletion is the answer? You yourself have all of the tools necessary to fix your problem. Uncle G (talk) 11:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why should such an article exist? You can foam just about *any* plastic. I thought Wikipedia was not a dictionary, if I article-ize it, it will be a dictionary entry. 76.66.192.6 (talk) 04:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • It shouldn't. This is too broad a topic for a redirect, let alone a standalone article. The number of types of plastics has grown exponentially over the past century and a half - too many for a dab page. Delete. 147.70.242.40, temporarily at 147.70.242.41 (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - it's generally a very bad idea to redirect a general term to a more specific one. B.Wind (talk) 03:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

TF:SA → Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities/Student Affairs[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. Moved to WP:TFSA & links updated. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what the TF pseudospace means, but it is an improper CNR to a non-content wikiproject. MBisanz talk 02:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - TF:SA is shown as a short cut on the target page. Reserving recommendation for the time being, except to recommend input from the members of the WikiProject. B.Wind (talk) 03:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Figured it out, it means Task Force. I think they can get along with a WP: prefix like all the other Wikipedia: pages. MBisanz talk 15:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep until orphaned. While this is too recent to trip my personal threshold for historical value, it had some relevant usage in internal discussions. Breaking the links would obscure the context and explanation behind the editors' thoughts and make future interpretation of those discussions significantly more difficult. We ought not to gratuitiously break those internal links.
    Once the page has been orphaned, consider me an "abstain". Rossami (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Famous Wikipedians → Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles[edit]

The result of the debate was Kept. No consensus for deletion & not likely to conflict with article content. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navel gazing CNR to a wikipedia page, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 02:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - no need for a self-referencing article here. We try to avoid it whenever possible. 147.70.242.40, temporarily at 147.70.242.41 (talk) 22:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is a CNR that is helpful and makes sense. --UsaSatsui (talk) 18:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

WPT:TENNIS → Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improper CNR to a Wikitalk page, proper usage is WT: not WPT: MBisanz talk 02:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

WPT:X → Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 01:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improper CNR to a wiki talk page, also non-intuitive to topic. MBisanz talk 02:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The correct shortcut exists at WT:X. Uncle G (talk) 11:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Uncle G. The WPT: prefix should be eliminated since WT: exists. B.Wind (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Best warrior ever → Pier Gerlofs Donia[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete per WP:SNOW; clear delete. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 21:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda subjective, huh? Also links to no content. Daimore msg 02:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nuke this redirect - it's a shame that it doesn't fit a CSD category, but clearly this is most useless (this could just as easily point to Jack Bauer, Audie Murphy, or Tamerlane, for example. B.Wind (talk) 03:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think a case can be made for calling it vanadalim and therefore deleatable under G3. Same applies for the one bellow. --76.71.208.254 (talk) 03:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nuke this redirect - Personally, I'm surprised that this was not Speedy Deleted. Obvious vandalism. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 03:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This and the one immediately below were created by a user who has since been indef-blocked as a sockpuppet. I also could see an argument for speedy-deletion as vandalism, though to me it looks more like a case of poor judgment. Regular delete would be fine. Rossami (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Greatest warrior ever → Pier Gerlofs Donia[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy delete per WP:SNOW; clear delete. Lumped in with above "best warrior ever" discussion. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 21:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above. Subjective, links to nowhere. Daimore msg 02:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nuke this redirect - see discussion above. B.Wind (talk) 03:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Harley Quinn Smith → Kevin Smith[edit]

The result of the debate was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

his daughter 68.37.149.120 (talk) 04:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • … whose naming is discussed in the target article. Uncle G (talk) 11:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harley Quinn Smith. Redirecting non-notable family members to their notable spouse/parent/child/significant other is an accepted way to prevent the recreation of material that does not meet Wikipedia's generally accepted inclusion criteria. Rossami (talk) 23:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2008_November_11&oldid=1072176762"