Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 March 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 23[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 23, 2008

Chino Hills ParkwayCalifornia State Route 142[edit]

The result of the debate was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only a short piece of Chino Hills Parkway is SR 142; it extends in both directions beyond SR 142. See a map of the road. NE2 23:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unless nominator proposes a new stand-alone article covering Chino Hills Parkway in its entirety, keep as a useful redirect as a likely search item. B.Wind (talk) 05:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Since we lack coverage on the parkway as a whole, it should redirect to the coverage that we do have. -- Kéiryn talk 22:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep per above. NE2 does not tell the truth at all. --75.47.139.131 (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

1897-08-01August 1[edit]

The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 23:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is a good faith attempt to fix red links created by a series of edits to Japanese battleship Asahi where piped date links of the format [[1897-08-01|01 Aug 1897]] were inserted. I've cleaned up the date-formatting, so, I think this (and many other redirects at [1]) can be deleted. This discussion is a test-case, and unless there is some other reason to keep these types of redirects around, the others will be brought here in due course. Neier (talk) 11:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirects by User:Toddy1 appears to be a mistaken good faith attempt to force a certain dating format which he prefers. This is in violation of WP:MOSDATE, and is perhaps due to misunderstanding on how the date formatting code works in Wikipedia. --MChew (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all — In fact, I had already discovered and deleted a handful of these (under WP:CSD#R3) before I noticed a tagged redirect and found this discussion. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 16:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • CSD#R3 makes sense to me. Should I withdraw this discussion? Neier (talk) 11:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • It would be better to let an admin close this as this is Day 6 of a five day discussion. B.Wind (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.