Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 August 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 14, 2008

Tabuu (SSBB)Super Smash Bros. Brawl[edit]

The result of the debate was Retarget. Lenticel (talk) 02:08, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible search NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 04:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question. By requesting a retrageting are you suggesting that would believe that Tabuu (SSBB is a plasuable search term. I am asking because the idea that it is not is the basis for the RFD. --76.69.165.93 (talk) 18:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, sorry, I don't understand that, do you mind clarifying? Pie is good (Apple is the best) 01:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He's saying that almost no Wikipedia editor who was searching would search for "Tabuu (SSBB)"
Hm, maybe because SSBB is a common acronym for Super Smash Bros. Brawl? JuJube (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It makes sense as a search term to me. --UberScienceNerd Talk Contributions 01:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Water fluoridation conspiracy theoryOpposition to water fluoridation[edit]

The result of the debate was Keep (non-admin closure). The article actually discusses the conspiracy theory, so this argument of the nominator is invalid. The existance of this redirect can prevent further attempts to move the page, which means that the redirect is quite usuful (per Rossami). Ruslik (talk) 05:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was created to make a point. Probably unlikely to be useful [1]. The target also doesn't talk about a conspiracy theory. See [2] for more information. --Raijinili (talk) 02:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The target -does- talk about conspiracy theories, and water fluoridation is a pretty popular one...has been for quite a while ("They're after our precious fluids..."). Also a plausible search term. --UsaSatsui (talk) 02:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This sems like a useful and likely search term for the target, regardless of why it was created, and regardless of whether it's neutral or not. Gavia immer (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The redirect was automatically created as the result of a non-consensus pagemove that was subsequently reverted. Weak keep because the redirect helps preserve some of the history of the dispute and might inhibit others from making the same mistake. Rossami (talk) 13:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.