Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 July 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 27[edit]

Mien churches → Yao people[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 01:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Yao people have a religion based upon Taoism so the redirect does not make much sense unless it is referring to their ethnic religion. Abstrakt 05:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete for reason already mentioned above. Abstrakt 05:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)*[reply]
  • Delete so that a proper article can possibly be created in the futur should their be a particularity with mein churches, etc. -- ChrisDHDR   • contrib's 18:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Jorge Rodríguez Rodríguez → Jorge Rodríguez (politician)[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 01:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The right full name of Venezuela's Vice President is Jorge Rodríguez Gómez. "Rodríguez Rodríguez" is wrong. See http://www.rnv.gov.ve/noticias/index.php?act=ST&f=2&t=44571 JRSP 10:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The monstrous movie → Cloverfield[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 01:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was created in anticipation that the official title of the movie production code-named Cloverfield would be revealed to be Monstrous or something similar. Since the movie's producer, JJ Abrams, has recently denied this will be the film's title, this article now serves no purpose. Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 14:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not the film's title, nor is it a commonly used alternative title. --- RockMFR 00:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Aarktica 13:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment see also Monstrous --Closedmouth 07:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no need for this harlock_jds 22:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete neither something someone would search for nor appropriate (use of "the" and "movie") -- ChrisDHDR    • @ 18:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, it's not the title, and the Cloverfield redirects are out of &#%^@ control. Wikipedia is not a viral marketing platform. —ptk✰fgs 20:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per others; Monstrous is what others would type, not this. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Sisterprojects → Wikipedia:Sister projects[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 01:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect. Russ (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Monstrous (film) → Cloverfield[edit]

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 01:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect was created in anticipation that the official title of the movie production code-named Cloverfield would be revealed to be Monstrous or something similar. Since the movie's producer, JJ Abrams, has recently denied this will be the film's title, this now serves no purpose. Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 16:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not the film's title, nor is it a commonly used alternative title. --- RockMFR 00:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Aarktica 13:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete should not have been made in the first place harlock_jds 22:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not the right title for the purpose, should be replaced by Monstrous -- ChrisDHDR   • contrib's 18:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. J-stan Talk 15:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, it's not the title, and the Cloverfield redirects are out of &#%^@ control. Wikipedia is not a viral marketing platform. —ptk✰fgs 20:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because nobody's going to type in Monstrous (film). Monstrous is appropriate enough as a redirect. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Kate's tool → Wikipedia:WikiProject edit counters[edit]

The result of the debate was keep. WjBscribe 01:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another cross-namespace redirect; previously deleted but created again by another user. Russ (talk) 17:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cross-namespace redirects are normally not allowed, with the exceptuion of the WP and WT pesudo namespaces. But this is a tool often sought by people who may not easily find it without this redirect, and so i think this should be an exception to the general rule. DES (talk) 19:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this would be a good exception. The term is one which is almost solely used on Wikipedia and related projects. The incoming links lead me to believe it's used quite a bit. --- RockMFR 00:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this, as an exception This is the name which I and many of us know best, and the name we are likely to remember. DGG (talk) 04:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As above. i (said) (did) 04:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per DGG. --Aarktica 13:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I feel most people would be refering to edit counters when typing in Kate's Tool. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • KeepAs per above -- ChrisDHDR   • contrib's 18:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_27&oldid=1138574675"