Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 February 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 25[edit]

Italian Parliament → Parliament of Italy[edit]

The result of the debate was Move request belongs at WP:RM. -- JLaTondre 16:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In order to move Parliament of Italy to Italian Parliament, correct translation for Parlamento Italiano. --Checco 15:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The Socialists → The Socialists (Italy)[edit]

The result of the debate was Move request belongs at WP:RM. -- JLaTondre 16:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In order to move The Socialists (Italy) to The Socialists. --Checco 15:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

WP:JUPE → Wikipedia:Protected titles[edit]

The result of the debate was keep. John Reaves (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sophomoric slang. Telling users that the article they're trying to re-create has been juped is approximately as mature as having a redirect from WP:PWN. —Cryptic 16:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC) (ps: ugh.)[reply]

  • Keep. Jupe has been historically used on the internet to indicate that something is administrativeley unavailble and is not an inherintly offensive term. Dalnet, Effnet, and even Freenode uses jupe as part of system settings, it is not user slang like pwn is. — xaosflux Talk 18:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or should I say D3l337. Wikipedia is not IRC. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 23:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Inoffensive (if obscure) technical jargon for something blocked by an admin. Doesn't meet any criteria in "When should we delete a redirect?" or in WP:CSD. —Dgiest c 19:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

WP:PWN → Wikipedia:Ownership of articles[edit]

The result of the debate was speedily deleted by WP:CSD#G7 due to obvious ughness GracenotesT § 05:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. I don't think I need to elaborate. —Cryptic 16:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

14th Avenue → York Regional Road 71[edit]

The result of the debate was converted into a disambiguation page, no longer a redirect. Dar-Ape 20:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the only 14th Avenue, and certainly not notable to the point that it should have its own redirect. Mhking 16:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. There are a shitload more like this one that need cleaned up, and it seems someone has created a rather large walled garden of non-notable streets. Oh boy. --- RockMFR 17:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Caturday → 4chan[edit]

The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux Talk 04:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Target has no mention of subject. cesarb 23:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, I guess. "Caturday" is a weekly event on 4chan (everyone posts pictures of cats on Saturday. If someone is looking up Caturday then the 4chan article is the best place to send them. Koweja 00:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, within that weird community it's very notable, and 9,000+ google hits tying the two together. Doesn't hurt anything. - Denny 17:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom: Target has no mention of subject, so the redir is worse than useless, being an intentional blind alley that misleads readers. If Caturday is notable, let someone write an article about it or at least a section at 4chan. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 23:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, since it's a fairly important part of 4chan's community, though mention it in the article. ShadowMan1od 00:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think it'll help to prevent the creation of a 'Caturday' article. John Reaves (talk) 07:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Hueg → Xbox[edit]

The result of the debate was speedy deleted, G4. —Cryptic 13:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See previous deletion of thie redirect. Maybe permanently preventing this article from being made? ShadowMan1od 00:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I think this might be the work of someone from Encyclopedia Dramatica (http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/XBox#LOL_XBOX_IS_HUEG). John Reaves (talk) 07:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_February_25&oldid=1084304853"