Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 August 9

9 August[edit]

Happycat → British Shorthair[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted --Cyde Weys 14:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is left-over from a vandalism spree against British Shorthair (which remains semi-protected). The British Shorthair article does not contain any information about the Happycat internet phenomenon, and discussion at the talk page has generally concluded that Happycat is not sufficiently notable to mention in the British Shorthair article. The only people this redirect is likely to help are vandals looking for a place to insert material about Happycat. —ptk✰fgs 08:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, for sure. It is intensely frustrating that YTMNDers consider react to removal of fads from mainstream articles by creating fads based on the removal of the fads, and then assert that this makes the fad notable. The sooner these people recognise that they have their own wiki and Wikipedia is not their playground the better. Just zis Guy you know? 08:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Keep it on the YTMND wiki, guys. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 13:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not the place for it. Pacific Coast Highway ^{(blah • I'm a hot toe picker)} 20:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

His written word → Bible[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted --Cyde Weys 14:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else suggested this should be deleted. Considering neutrality, and that this could refer to the holy scriptures of any number of religions (or even non-holy things written by male authors), the redirect seems to violate policy. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 08:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's not NPOV in the slightest. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 21:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, could easily mean non-holy writings so turning into a disambig would also make not much sense. Kusma (討論) 08:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Kusma. --Zoz (t) 16:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete of course. Wesley 16:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Not So Forbidden City → Forbidden City[edit]

The nominated redirect was Speedy Deleted (G3). -- JLaTondre 00:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect arose through move vandalism. Has no useful purpose. Waggers 20:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A prank. Delete. --Sumple (Talk) 23:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've tagged this with {{db-g3}} per WP:CSD#G3 (vandalism including pagemove-vandalism-created redirects). BigNate37_(T) 00:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.