Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 September 2

< September 1	September 3 >

September 2[edit]

File:D S Prefects.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:D S Prefects.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo design exceeding Threshold of originality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:"Abstract" by Robert Edward Weaver, c. 1982.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. — ξ ^xplicit 21:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Abstract" by Robert Edward Weaver, c. 1982.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is clearly a photo of the Weaver work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - uploader left note on my talk page.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paseka Sekese from Bidvest Wits F.C..JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paseka Sekese from Bidvest Wits F.C..JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Same user uploaded File:Paseka Sekesa at FNB Stadium.jpeg which has dubious licensing status. On the talk page the user showed they did not understand WP's copyright requirements - they claimed the pictures as own work but said they were sent them by the photo's subject. The license here cannot be trusted. BethNaught (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Team from Thabong in yellow and gold kit.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Team from Thabong in yellow and gold kit.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See above. Also this is clearly a recent photo of and old photo and so an derivative work; this adds another layer of dubiousness. BethNaught (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Craig Washington.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craig Washington.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"Image courtesy of Texas State Senate Media Services", so not a work of the US Federal government, and presumably not public domain. —innotata 09:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neverhood's Klayman as the Vitruvian Man.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neverhood's Klayman as the Vitruvian Man.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

The linked website says "© 1996-97, The Neverhood, All Rights Reserved." with no mention of this being under the FAL or any other free license; no specific evidence has been presented that this was otherwise released by the copyright holders. —innotata 19:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Valeriu Strelet.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valeriu Strelet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

We don't have a PD-MoldovaGov template and I'm not clear on the status of the law in that country. However, the source site is not obviously an arm of the government and looks instead as though it's a political party. The site clearly claims copyright at the bottom of the page, so this appears to me to be unfree. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CruzBJFphoto.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CruzBJFphoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Presumably a work of a U.S. territory government (Guam), so presumably not public domain. —innotata 20:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.