Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 November 9
November 9
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FOP. This image is not allowed in the USA because the sculptor, Paul DiPasquale, owns the rights to images of the sculpture. The uploader is not Paul DiPasquale. Binksternet (talk) 02:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be a 21st century sculpture. Needs permission from Paul DiPasquale. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 06:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is claimed as own work, but is either album cover art or a promotional photo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I have replaced some templates with other templates. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at Files for disscussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Loyola.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is claimed as own work, but the source is given as a yearbook dated 1998 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- I listed this before here. Adam9007 (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- This image is set for public view under the correct license - own work as own image and photographer, I Vincent Valdemira, Loyola Evergreen Annual Yearbook 14:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs)
- Please see WP:IOWN. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- This image is set for public view under the correct license - own work as own image and photographer, I Vincent Valdemira, Loyola Evergreen Annual Yearbook 14:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs)
- I listed this before here. Adam9007 (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- There is No indication of a Creative Commons or free license at the source given, and it's not clear if this is self/own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- I'm seeking a clarification if this qualifes as an 'artwork' or an architectural work. Also it wasn't clear if the archive name given was the uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Mefodiy.foundation.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is claimed as own work, but looks like a logo for the organisation listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:JNPT Port.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Available elsewhere on internet eg here, reverse Google search. Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. BethNaught (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:ItalianlibyaHoms.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is claimed as own work, but it looks VERY like an old archive image sourced from elsewhere. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FOP. Because the sculpture is modern and in the USA, the sculptor, Adam Reed Tucker, owns all the images of the sculpture. See http://www.nbm.org/exhibitions-collections/exhibitions/lego-architecture.html. Binksternet (talk) 16:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:BluDoors logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as own work, but is a logo for a Nigeran company. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:First flight sculpture.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete per WP:FOP, because this sculpture is in the USA. Sculptor Stephen H. Smith owns the rights to every photo of his sculpture. Binksternet (talk) 17:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Nactem hires.tif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is claimed as own work, but appears to be a hi-res organisational logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. This was produced by a company based in California. — ξxplicit 06:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:UE-ROLL-black.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Querying this image on the basis that whilst it's the uploaders photo, the design of the item shown within it is distinctive,. Is it creative enough to rise above TOO/functional elements? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Probably not in the United States. No idea what the source country is. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and change license to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. — ξxplicit 06:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Zingdigital.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is claimed as own work, but seems to be an organisational or brand logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Retag as {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and change license to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. — ξxplicit 06:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Hemashospital.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as self, but clearly an organisations logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Retag as {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. Nothing known about the source country's threshold of originality. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Uploader seemed to say on their talk page when I asked about this that they are not the original photographer. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is claimed as self, but appears to be a promotional image or album art sourced elsewhere. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cactus-image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This looks like it may be a promotional image sourced elsewhere, as a self photo wouldn't have a watermark. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- License at source http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/disclaim.html is not creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- In any event this flag image seems to be sourced from a third party, and I can't find a Creative Commons release there either.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The page you linked to contains a non-free licence. It also says that a lot of pictures come from third parties, and it is unclear if pictures from third parties can be licensed under that non-free licence in the first place. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- According to Special:Diff/689835880, this seems to be both "fair use" and "GFDL-self", which is contradictory. There is also a logo on the picture which probably is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.