Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 March 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 29

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sancho Macek.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pictures uploaded by User:Sushimaharaja

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: With Copyright status unclear, delete both. TLSuda (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:There Has Been a Change of Plan (2006).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Raqs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

One file was created by Monica Narula, the other one by Jatinder Marwaha. The uploader also has deleted files created by Monica Narula and Rana Dasgupta. The uploader can't be all three of them. Unclear if these were created by the uploader or by someone else. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Overwritten file: three in one.
  1. File uploaded by Kadoox (talk · contribs) and GeorgHH (talk · contribs): properly sourced in Special:PermanentLink/153943651. Keep this one.
  2. File uploaded by Zinkplaat (talk · contribs): sourced to Jan Solms in the edit summary but it doesn't say who Jan Solms is. No licensing information available. Delete this one.
  3. File uploaded by Mekanorg (talk · contribs): no source and no licence. Delete this one. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grave marker.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Güstrow Schloss.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
Is there some way to do a similar search for deleted and overwritten files on German Wikipedia? This query finds no identical files which haven't been deleted or overwritten. Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you asked me: no idea. --Leyo 19:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hurdy gurdy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
Indeed, but the files c:File:DraailierOpen.jpg and c:File:Draailier.jpg do exist. The file: Hurdy gurdy.jpg is a composite and enhanced image of these two. The original files were uploaded on 2003-06-09 on the nl.wikipedia by User:Arent (no longer active) from a photo of his own collection of hurdy gurdies. The original description was here: [1]. The photos were released under a GNU-license. JoJan (talk) 07:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
On Commons, it only says who the original uploader is, but it is not revealed whether this person is the author or if this person obtained pictures from elsewhere. The words "uit eigen verzameling" only seem to mean that the user owned a copy of the pictures, with no explanation as to how he obtained that copy of the picture. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icterus nigrogularis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep image is {{PD-US-no-notice}}. TLSuda (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:1940s advertisement 83d40m w Crosley image .png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Yes it is the entire advertisement. This image passed muster on July 22, 2014 with a fair use rationale attached. Crosley was a great sport fisherman, are we on an expedition? _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • If this is the entire advertisement, then it could be tagged as {{PD-US-no-notice}}. There mere act of scanning a 2D piece of paper does not make you the copyright holder and so the license tag is obviously incorrect. --B (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.