Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 January 10

< January 9	January 11 >

January 10[edit]

File:Sickle cell hemoglobin shortened.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sickle cell hemoglobin shortened.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sickle cell hemoglobin shortened.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dnepropetrovsk 9859s.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dnepropetrovsk 9859s.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Querying if this is permitted under FoP rules for origin country? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, has to be deleted--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Why ???? Mike Young (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is suitable for Wikipedia because Wikipedia is loosely speaking a news medium - just like for example, the English newspaper the Daily Mirror, which like Wikipedia does cover both recent things, and not-so-recent things such as the Great Patriotic War. It is far from clear that any photos taken in recent times in Ukraine are suitable Wikipedia Commons, because Commons considers limited rights of use to be unacceptable. Having laws that restrict use of photographs is very useful, just like laws that restrict use of cigarettes - as with cigarettes, you can have absolute rights of ownership, but restrictions on use. The kind of use made on Wikipedia is allowed.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then please reupload it as fair use.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Freedom of panorama (FoP) doies not exist in Ukraine.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.