Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 January 1
Appearance
< December 31 | January 2 > |
---|
January 1[edit]
File:RMS Queen Elizabeth 2 refit.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- The diagram of the ship and the cutaway section at least represent a copyrightable image so the claim of PD-Text is not applicable NtheP (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Keep; Listing process wasn't followed by @NtheP: / @Nthep:. (Why the varied capitalization??) Example: caption at Queen Elizabeth 2 remains untagged. --Elvey (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed. Apolgoies for oversight. NtheP (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ohio1956.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:Ohio1956.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Does not appear that this image was handled through the OTRS system. Unfortunately the original uploader Polypmaster (talk · contribs) has been inactive since 2011, thus we would not be able to obtain the written letter that he stated he had when uploading the document. Since we can not get the letter, we have no way of knowing if the free use of this image is allowed. AdmrBoltz 19:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Did you "contact Todd Sloan ([email protected]) for license verification."?--Elvey (talk) 12:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.