Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 26
| < October 25 | October 27 > |
|---|
October 26
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think the uploader is the actual creator. SKATER T a l k 08:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Photo of cover artwork so derivative? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Despite claim this is NOT simple text. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- I changed the license to Non-free logo. Do you think that would be the correct license? Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 23:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- This is logo artwork, not necessarily the uploaders to relicence. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:HMT Lancastria plaque.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Panel is artwork, and I'm not sure FoP applies. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- You say you are 'not sure'. Can you please provide a reason for listing the image here.--Racklever (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader hasn't provided any evidence that the sign is freely licensed, and the text is not a "work of artistic craftsmanship" as the text counts as a literary work and not as an artistic work. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Efoster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 13:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Appears to be a television screencap. Kelly hi! 14:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Egill Skallagrímsson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that uploader is artist. Kelly hi! 15:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:EHarm jlgphoto 108.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 16:17, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Eileen-daly.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 16:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
how do I prove evidence?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.225.165.48 (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Based on this editor being indef blocked on commons commons:User talk:JmKissme for falsely claiming ownership of uploaded images, the small size of this image and lack of EXIF data the likelihood that the uploader is the actual copyright holder of this image is extraordinarily small. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Groups Photo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The images is definitely not in the public domain. Koala15 (talk) 21:23, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Packaging artwork, not necessarily the up-loaders to re-license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Logo artwork, not necessarily the uploaders to re license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. From Diannaa's link bellow it's clear, that the image is {{PD-US}}. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 11:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:Pawneebillposter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear copyright status and source. There is no evidence that the historic society has licensed the image, but it looks old, so maybe it is in the public domain for some reason. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- This website says the poster is from 1888, his opening year. -- Diannaa (talk) 13:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: Where on that page does it say that? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 19:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- The content was moved; the information is now here. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: Where on that page does it say that? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 19:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted both. Diannaa (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Plaque commemorating those killed in Operation Tiger crop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Plaque commemorating those killed in Operation Tiger.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear age, but the year 1984 appears in the text, so it seems that it can't be older than that. Unless the sign was set up before 1978, the sign is still copyrighted. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- That's not the only possible criteria for keeping: if the memorial was installed by the U.S. government, then the plaque is PD, so the picture of it can be as well. I'll see what I can find. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, seems as if a non-profit organization set up the memorial. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- That's not the only possible criteria for keeping: if the memorial was installed by the U.S. government, then the plaque is PD, so the picture of it can be as well. I'll see what I can find. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:EcoCardpaymentcard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Card artwork, not necessarily uploaders to license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:18, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Possibly below the threshold of originality. If not, then the image is a copyright violation as the permission only allows you to use unchanged copies of the entire source web page. The uploader failed to include the text, HTML markup and other images on the source page, which is a violation of the licence terms. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, the claim that the original file is free could not be verified; the Commons file from the different uploader deleted for the same reason.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:Puertoayoramuelle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear source. Both credited to http://www.galapagosonline.com/ and to "I, the copyright holder of this work". Unknown if both are the same person. Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:PaulFootPose.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear source/author. It says that "I Jack Cullen created this work entirely by myself" but it also says that the author is "Paul Foot". Both can't be the photographer. The copyright tag also tells that you should link to http://www.paulfoot.tv/ which might mean that this website is the source of the image. Stefan2 (talk) 23:32, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- The permission doesn't permit modifications. Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:RiniIdolWulandari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Based on Google Translate, the permission is insufficient: it doesn't permit modifications, and it only permits use on websites but not for example on postcards, newspapers or e-mail. Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Unclear source. The {{information}} template suggests that the uploader created the image, but the copyright tag suggests that the image comes from the http://www.paddypowerpoker.com/ website. Stefan2 (talk) 23:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:OscarRoty.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Insufficient source to verify copyright tag. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, in particular, taking into account a complicated relation of the uploader with copyright laws documented at their talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:Paris Expo 1900.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear source. It says that "I (Jwbirks (talk)) created this work entirely by myself" but the copyright tag suggests that the image comes from the http://www.medals4trade.com/ website. Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Otan Ayegbaju images
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 11:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- File:Otan 1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Otan 2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Otan 3.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Otan 4.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
It says that the images are "self-made" by Michael Faleti, who might be the uploader. However, the copyright tag links to http://www.business-travel-nigeria.com/ which might mean that the images instead come from that website. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.