Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 16

< October 15	October 17 >

October 16

File:Drew Scott.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drew Scott.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It was tagged as a copyvio of this image. That's not the source image, since it's smaller and doesn't extend as far above Scott's head, but I can virtually guarantee you that both are cropped from another image. Nyttend (talk) 00:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Teja-in-white.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teja-in-white.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image was posted in 2008, two years before it was uploaded here, without evidence of a free license. If uploader is original photographer, they need to send permission to WP:OTRS. —RP88 ^(talk) 09:21, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Liveartsatnight.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liveartsatnight.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unclear copyright status. It says: "The use of this file is permitted only on Wikipedia." However, the history also shows various free copyright tags added by the uploader. I don't know whether the Wikipedia-only permission nullifies those free copyright tags. Stefan2 (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lubarov FishDay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lubarov FishDay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The museum is probably not the copyright holder to the artwork. Stefan2 (talk) 10:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marisa Warrington Small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marisa Warrington Small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that "Marisa Warrington retains full rights to the image" so the image seems to be unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maloyaroslavets Nikolaev Chyornoostrov Convent.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maloyaroslavets Nikolaev Chyornoostrov Convent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The uploader seems to mean that the permission is stated at http://autotravel.org.ru/phalbum/info.html but based on Google Translate, there doesn't seem to be any permission there. Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Malone D EG 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malone D EG 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

“

This image (or this Media) is copyrighted. The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that no reproduction of this image occurs without written consent from the photographer: www.erikagoldring.com <http://www.erikagoldring.com/>

”

This seems to indicate that the file is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Miriam Waddington.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miriam Waddington.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The permission doesn't seem to cover derivative works. Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mondragon Roberto 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Website says "The public may copy and use this information without charge, provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are reproduced on all copies". Diannaa (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mondragon Roberto 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Based on the statement on the file information page, I don't think that derivative works are allowed. Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It should be fine, as it's in the Public Domain - see here, and commons:template:PD-LosAlamos - Alison ^❤ 18:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm, the first link is a bit unclear as it seems that some things aren't government works:

For Scientific and Technical Information Only © Copyright 2011 Los Alamos National Security, LLC All rights reserved

Is this "scientific or technical information"? Depends on where on the website it comes from, I suppose... --Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Moondancephoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moondancephoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that the permission only is for one Wikipedia article. Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NCCARLogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:NCCARLogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious copyright statement. To be kept as fair use if unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nepal Protest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nepal Protest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission doesn't seem to allow derivative works. Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Newatlanticlocks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newatlanticlocks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission only appears to be for the uploader and not for derivative works. Stefan2 (talk) 12:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Newpacificlocks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newpacificlocks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission only appears to be for the uploader and not for derivative works. Stefan2 (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Photos by Marianne F Pettersen

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Photos in this group have been deleted. Diannaa (talk) 21:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norway Oppland Lesja Church by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Kongsvoll by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Norway Notodden Heddel Stav Kirke by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Norway Dovre Snøhetta by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Drivstua railway station by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Domkirke in Stavanger by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looking at File:Norway Notodden Heddel Stav Kirke by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg and some other files, one could interpret the e-mail to mean that the uploader only has requested permission for Wikipedia, which is unfortunately insufficient. The statement at File:Klukstad altarpiece photo by Marianne F Pettersen.jpg seems to confirm that the permission only is for Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NutTreeFuture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:NutTreeFuture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No freedom of panorama for signs in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:NutTreeSign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:NutTreeSign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No freedom of panorama for signs in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OAS Laureano Gómez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:OAS Laureano Gómez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The permission statement only permits non-commercial use and probably doesn't come from the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 12:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pattycannonhouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pattycannonhouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The permission only seems to be "for teaching or for personal study or research" and it is unclear if you are permitted to modify the image. Stefan2 (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pipe Creek Sinkhole.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - Not Free. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pipe Creek Sinkhole.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

According to the text on the file information page, the permission only seems to be for a single Wikipedia article. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What issue specifically needs to be addressed? The creator of this image, Ed McDonald, died in February. He definitely wanted the image used for the Pipe Creek Sinkhole article, and I don't think that he would have objected to its use for any legitimate scientific or educational purpose or in other Wikipedia articles. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem it is not enough to have permission to use it on Wikipedia, or even for legitimate scientific or educational purposes. Wikipedia requires that material be licensed such that it may be used by anyone, for any purpose, including commercial use. Please see WP:COPYREQ for details. —RP88 ^(talk) 00:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We used the "CopyrightedFreeUseProvided" tag, which should be determinative. I added the additional comment because it was I and not the image creator who uploaded the file. I can delete the comment without violating the intentions of the now-deceased image creator. Would that remedy the problem? -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 22:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the permission is insufficient. A proper permission needs to be obtained from the copyright holder. If the photographer is dead, the permission will have to come from the photographer's heir. It is not possible to remove the extra comment as that would falsify the information about what permission you have. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm checking the fair use criteria to see if this image qualifies for use in the Pipe Creek Sinkhole article; but I doubt that I can make a case for the fossil turtle image since the article is about the site itself and not about the fauna discovered there. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on the sufficiency of the following as a non-free use rationale:

Description = This is a low-resolution, medium-distance image of Pipe Creek Sinkhole in Grant County, Indiana, made in 2003 by the late Ed McDonald (1938-2013), an amateur geologist from Auburn, Indiana, who participated in excavating the site. | Source = http://www.angelfire.com/in4/earthpages/pipe_creek.html | Article = Pipe Creek Sinkhole | Portion = Whole of original image. | Low resolution = Yes | Purpose = Visually identifies the paleontological site that is the subject of the article before it was fully excavated. | Replaceability = No free equivalent image available. | Other information = The copyright probably belongs to Ed McDonald's heirs. Using the image here will not affect their rights to control other uses. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFC#UUI §1. The image fails WP:NFCC#1 as someone could go to that location with a camera. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, they can't. The photo is of the site as it appeared ten years ago before most of the paleontological excavation was completed. It's in a commercial limestone quarry and either has been or is in the process of being obliterated now that the scientific work is done. Whatever images exist of the site as it once was belong to universities or private individuals. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 22:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I propose modifying the explanation on "replaceability" to read: "No free equivalent image available. Making a new image is not possible because the appearance of the site has been altered by the paleontological excavation. The sinkhole depression partly remains, but the fossiliferous sediment (the dark-colored material in this image) has been completely removed." -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pipe Creek Turtle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pipe Creek Turtle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

According to the text on the file information page, the permission only seems to be for a single Wikipedia article. Stefan2 (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What issue specifically needs to be addressed? The creator of this image, Ed McDonald, died in February. He definitely wanted the image used for the Pipe Creek Sinkhole article, and I don't think that he would have objected to its use for any legitimate scientific or educational purpose or in other Wikipedia articles. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- We used the "CopyrightedFreeUseProvided" tag, which should be determinative. I added the additional comment because it was I and not the image creator who uploaded the file. I can delete the comment without violating the intentions of the now-deceased image creator. Would that remedy the problem? -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 22:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - The problem is that the permission is insufficient. A proper permission needs to be obtained from the copyright holder. If the photographer is dead, the permission will have to come from the photographer's heir. It is not possible to remove the extra comment as that would falsify the information about what permission you have. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Radovan-jelasic-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radovan-jelasic-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Nonderivative. Stefan2 (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RavenClimbout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:RavenClimbout.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Nonderivative. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WayneMcMinnville.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:WayneMcMinnville.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Nonderivative. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ray Casey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted as this cartoon is still under copyright to the Daily Mail. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ray Casey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that "This image (or this Media) is copyrighted. The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that you may not claim that you took the photo yourself" but it also says that the image is used under fair dealing provisions in British law, which is contradictory. Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In small print at the bottom of the cartoon it says "Daily Mail Copyright". The term of copyright in the UK is p.m.a+70. Even if the artist died immediately after creating the cartoon, it won't be public domain until 2051. As a derivative work of a copyrighted work, this image is non-free (even if the photographer has released their photograph under a free license). —RP88 ^(talk) 16:23, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Reeves Corner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reeves Corner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Commons:COM:FOP#United Kingdom doesn't apply to signs like this. Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I noticed that there isn't any permission from the photographer either. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Richard G. Peers, age 16 (painted by Mai Griffin).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard G. Peers, age 16 (painted by Mai Griffin).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Wikipedia-only permission. Stefan2 (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Richard G. Peers, age 2 (painted by Mai Griffin).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard G. Peers, age 2 (painted by Mai Griffin).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Wikipedia-only permission. Stefan2 (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Richmond Station Melbourne1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richmond Station Melbourne1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unfree: "the creator must be notified of commercial usages". Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MiJournal screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MiJournal screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a screenshot or promo material for an app, not necessarily something the uploader can re-license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sabine Appelmans.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabine Appelmans.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The permission only seems to be for the uploader, not for anyone else. Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sacred Pushkar Lake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sacred Pushkar Lake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission is only for educational purposes. Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Santa-xenu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa-xenu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The wording "copyrights granted to Wikipedia" suggests that the permission might be Wikipedia-only. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shoreline Puskar Lake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shoreline Puskar Lake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission is only for educational purposes. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SHUNTFig1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SHUNTFig1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Non-commercial restriction, possibly {{PD-ineligible}}. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sir John Meurig Thomas by David Griffiths.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir John Meurig Thomas by David Griffiths.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Wikipedia-only permission. Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Spode Platter Aesop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept for now; the image is now tagged as OTRS pending. Diannaa (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spode Platter Aesop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Non-free: permission needed for each use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake was to load the file onto Wikimedia Commons. I have reloaded it to English Wikimedia under a different name and will make the appropriate change on the article page. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that! When you upload a duplicate image like this, we will just have to delete the most recent image so that we don't lose the original image history and so that we don't keep multiple copies of it. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stillwaterpreschurch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stillwaterpreschurch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Licence is only for Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sunset Line.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Not Free. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunset Line.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Wikipedia-only permission. Might be ineligible for copyright. Unused without foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.artist concept of detector.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - Not Free Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.artist concept of detector.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission is only for reproduction, not for modification. Stefan2 (talk) 14:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EECTF Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:EECTF Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo, Not necessarily uploaders to re-license Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Château Batailley.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château Batailley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a wine label, and not necessarily uploaders to uploaded. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dead Cool releases 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dead Cool releases 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is an image of cover art. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly is. Photographed by me. With permission from Esben Roos Svendsen, who runs the label. I work on this article to improve it, hoping to get that nominated-for-deletion banner removed asap. This label is important in the punk and garage scene in Fredrikstad, and elsewhere too. Its documentation is very much needed.--Mc peko (talk) 15:34, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Scottsdale-Stillman Park 20 -Scottdale Model Railroad Club.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scottsdale-Stillman Park 20 -Scottdale Model Railroad Club.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The subject of the photo is probably copyrighted; see Commons:COM:FOP#United States. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. How can the subject in the photo which I took be copyrighted when it is a display of various of toy trains at the park? These are layouts which aren't even copyrighted. The picture is focused on the displays and not on the building nor it's interior. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You can't always take photos of things in parks (see e.g. Korean War Veterans Memorial#United States postage stamp court case). Someone made the railway system. As we are talking about toys, it's not utilitarian either, see Commons:COM:TOYS. You can take photos of constructed buildings which are visible from public places (see s:United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 1/Section 120), but I don't know if this also applies to toy houses. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - 1. In regard to Korean War Veterans Memorial#United States postage stamp court case - the picture in question is not of a Design and construction, Memorial, Troop statistics or United States postage stamp.

2. In regard to Commons:COM:TOYS. The toys in question do not have a visible trademark and the toys are barely distinguishable themsleves.

Now, this is my opinion. Let's let someone with true knowledge of the subject tell us what is what. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote at User talk:Stefan2#File:Scottsdale-Stillman Park 20 -Scottdale Model Railroad Club.jpg, I don't think that the problem is that the toys are there, but how they are arranged – someone probably owns the copyright to their arrangement. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I checked with the people there. These are temporary hobby displays, not permanent ones and therefore not copyrighted, plus there are no prohibitions as to photographs and such. I am absolutely sure that there aren't any problems. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Remains of Ancient Vaishali.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Remains of Ancient Vaishali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Commons:COM:FOP#India doesn't apply to text. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Clouds.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clouds.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Two files in one. Upload by User:Pramod sao has unknown source and copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So the proposal is only to delete the middle revision? I support that. --99of9 (talk) 22:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gypsum Fantastic - user image.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: One image was deleted by Magog the Ogre on 29 October; the other is okay to keep as uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 16:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gypsum Fantastic - user image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Two images in one. The one by User:Rantanplann is unsourced and unlicensed. The other one can probably be kept. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Klein.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted both; we don't have enough information about the baseball card to determine its copyright status, and the glasswork image is a derivative work of a copyright artwork, which we don't have permission to display. Diannaa (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klein.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Two files in one. The current one is a derivative of something made by glass which probably counts as an artwork. Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Meenakshi Vijayakumar, 1st woman fire officer, India.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meenakshi Vijayakumar, 1st woman fire officer, India.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Two files in one.

Probably copyvio, see http://newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/article1438348.ece (earlier but only shows a part of the photo).
Same uploader and web resolution, so maybe copyvio too. Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shawn G. Chittle (left) and DJ Grand Wizzard Theodore.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shawn G. Chittle (left) and DJ Grand Wizzard Theodore.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Two files in one.

The file by Loudes13 (talk · contribs) doesn't have a licence.
The file by Flintmichigan (talk · contribs) doesn't have a source. Note that the file uploaded by Bdve (talk · contribs) is the same image. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.