Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 June 9
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 9
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; metadata shows the photo was taken by Neal Krone / Sundance Institute; a likely source for the upload is http://www.imdb.com/media/rm646030336/nm2318385 Diannaa (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sourced to "Sundance Institute" which is unlikely to be uploader. Other uploads from this user have been very clear copyvios. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Harryboyles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bowman-Gilfillan-Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a logo of a corporation, however, the user has piblished it under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 License. This seems dubious.
93.186.22.119 (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark as PD-text -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 04:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly below the threshold of originality, but it's unused and we don't seem to have any use for it. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.