Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 31
| < October 30 | November 1 > |
|---|
October 31
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:World Population Forecast to 2050 from International Futures.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits Ronhjones (Talk) 00:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Dianna (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zierke, Ernst.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file lacks proof that the image was published over 70 years ago. The quoted source shows an upload date of six weeks after the upload to Wikipedia. I was unable to locate a source that pre-dates the upload. The file is likely still under copyright in the United States. Dianna (talk) 01:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe you are right, but could we please keep the file on Wikipedia as unfree?Hoops gza (talk) 02:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- We can do that if you can recall where you sourced it; any online source you provide must pre-date the upload. This step is required in order to satisfy the WP:NFCC policy criterion #4: Previous publication. Non-free content must have been previously published or publicly displayed outside Wikipedia. Can you remember where you got the file? -- Dianna (talk) 02:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I cannot find the original source for this file.Hoops gza (talk) 04:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Here, I found one : Holocaust Research Project; I will put the necessary templates in place for fair use for one article. -- Dianna (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I cannot find the original source for this file.Hoops gza (talk) 04:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- We can do that if you can recall where you sourced it; any online source you provide must pre-date the upload. This step is required in order to satisfy the WP:NFCC policy criterion #4: Previous publication. Non-free content must have been previously published or publicly displayed outside Wikipedia. Can you remember where you got the file? -- Dianna (talk) 02:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zigrids Meierovics.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file lacks proof that the image was published over 70 years ago. The quoted source is the Latvian Wiki, where the file is present as fair-use. I was unable to find any proof of publication that pre-dates the upload to the Latvian wiki. The file is likely still under copyright in the United States. Dianna (talk) 01:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The art does not belong to the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph of public art belongs to the uploader. The artwork was a chalk drawing on a street that has been cropped to exclude the rest of the street. It does not even exist anymore, having been washed away within hours of its completion. The drawing was a voluntary effort for a fundraising event and releases were signed by all of the artists. Many people have taken photographs of these streets and these images and many of them have been published. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see File:"Forever Tall" CITYarts, Inc. mural.jpg which also is public art and the article on Public Art. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 00:58, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rules on freedom of panorama vary from county to country. Commons:Freedom of panorama is the relevant policy page. The United States has freedom of panorama for buildings, but not for two-dimensional works of art. -- Dianna (talk) 03:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No freedom of panorama in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Photograph of copyright protected art Eeekster (talk) 01:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph of public art belongs to the uploader. I made an error on the initial form submitted because I was using a copy of one filled out previously for another file. When I saw your notice, I saw my error and corrected it. You now have reversed my correction of the inaccurate data I supplied with the image. I presumed that was your reason for citing the image so I removed the tag. Sorry, because I did not access the other photographs, I did not see the other tags at the time and logged off.
The photograph of the landscape includes artwork that is a mural or sign painted on the building. The photograph is a landscape ("streetscape") that includes several buildings. I have cropped it to concentrate mostly on the wall of one building. The image is a copy of a historic photograph that is copyright free and available at the county archives. The drawing was a voluntary effort for a fundraising event and releases were signed by all of the artists. Many people have taken photographs of the building and many images of the landscape have been published. When published, the photographs only credit the photographer. I have released my copyright in the form. I have plenty of other photographs of the festival that include murals and drawings on buildings and streets, several of which I have cropped to include in this article. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 22:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see File:"Forever Tall" CITYarts, Inc. mural.jpg which also is public art and the article on Public Art. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 00:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If I post this image as a photograph of a several buildings on South Pineapple Avenue in Sarasota -- what is the copyright convention? _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 03:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rules on freedom of panorama vary from county to country. Commons:Freedom of panorama is the relevant policy page. The United States has freedom of panorama for buildings, but not for two-dimensional works of art. -- Dianna (talk) 03:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A different file, mentioned in the discussion above, is now up for deletion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Forever Tall" CITYarts, Inc. mural.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Photograph of copyright protected art Eeekster (talk) 02:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph of public art belongs to the uploader. The artwork was a chalk drawing on a street that has been cropped to exclude the rest of the street. It does not even exist anymore, having been washed away within weeks of its completion. The drawing was a voluntary effort for a fundraising event and releases were signed by all of the artists. Many people have taken photographs of these streets and these images and many of them have been published. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see File:"Forever Tall" CITYarts, Inc. mural.jpg which also is public art and the article on Public Art. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The photograph may belong to you (and I certainly believe it does), but the art you photographed is subject to copyright and that copyright is owned by the creator of the art. Eeekster (talk) 01:40, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is no differences between my photographs and those posted to the article Public art. None bear a copyright issue and all are released only by the photographer, just as I have. Please check all the images and note the satisfactory completion of the forms for each of them.
- commons:Category:Public art
- File:'Occupy Paradeplatz' in Zürich 2011-11-19 14-50-44.JPG
- File:'Occupy Paradeplatz' in Zürich 2011-11-19 14-41-04.jpg
- File:Edderkoppmannen.jpg
- File:Free Art.jpg
Determine why none of these images in the Commons have issues by asking higher up the chain, if necessary. That holds true for the many public art images in WP. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 03:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rules on freedom of panorama vary from county to country. Commons:Freedom of panorama is the relevant policy page. The rules are different in Switzerland than they are in the United States. The United States has freedom of panorama for buildings, but not for two-dimensional works of art. -- Dianna (talk) 03:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zasluzhenny sudostroitel.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zasche.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zasche.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- F8 PD-USGov --Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CadburyMiniEggs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:CadburyMiniEggs.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cadbury fingers canada.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cadbury fingers canada.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.