Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 18

< October 17	October 19 >

October 18[edit]

File:Online.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Online.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Derivative work of packaging. Stefan2 (talk) 00:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wallin.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wallin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The source ("from ndcourts.com") is not very exact. The man on the photo died in 1923, but there is no evidence that the photo was published before being uploaded here. Stefan2 (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Traditional Mirpuri-Pahari-Pothohari-Hindkowan Dresses from Azad Kashmir, Pothohar Region and Hazara.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traditional Mirpuri-Pahari-Pothohari-Hindkowan Dresses from Azad Kashmir, Pothohar Region and Hazara.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Exif shows: "Copyright, Marcus Ranum 2008" Eeekster (talk) 00:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Empire.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Empire.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Overwritten file: three in one.
Version by User:Andryn2006: F9 ([1] returns "Last-Modified: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 20:16:52 GMT")
Versions by User:R013: F9 should be obvious.
Current version: Logo which is likely copyrightable. If kept as fair use, it should only be used in the article Empire Kosher. The article Art Deco in Durban is meant to use one of the other files under this name. Stefan2 (talk) 00:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salt the file name, overly generic, liable to be overwritten by some random Empire topic. If anything is kept, it needs a different filename. -- 70.24.247.66 (talk) 05:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing should remain under this name since the file currently blocks a Commons photo of Empire State Building, but that's another problem. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Moved and partially deleted. I've gotten rid of all revisions except for the logo, since it may be claimable under fair use, but the rest are clearly copyvios. Meanwhile, I've moved it without redirect to File:Empire Kosher logo.jpg, due to the masking issue that Stefan notes. Nyttend (talk) 14:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Comment Re-opened at #File:Empire Kosher logo.jpg. User:AnomieBOT closed the discussion after User:Nyttend's actions above, and it seems less confusing to restart the discussion. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I didn't expect the bot to react this way to the situation. Nyttend (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakib Khan 2012.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakib Khan 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This appears to be a derivative work. Eeekster (talk) 03:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of what? There's nothing necessarily wrong with DWs; the whole reason for prohibiting CC-ND licenses is to ensure that derivative works can be created. Nyttend (talk) 03:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I could find where he took it from, I'd be doing an F9. But I really doubt the image is his and strongly suspect he's using his flikr account to whitewash the license. And I did find the original image on MSNBC in Google image search but the page had changed so I can't directly use that. Eeekster (talk) 03:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

F9 All you need to do is to Google for the full-size image on Flickr, and you'll find it here under "related photos" sourced to Reuters. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per Stefan's find. Eeekster, why couldn't you use the original image on MSNBC? Just place {{db-copyvio|for reasons stated at talk}} on the file page and explain the situation at the talk page. Nyttend (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Malina2012.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malina2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Invalid PD claim. Eeekster (talk) 03:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Viziqtanaazis2012.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viziqtanaazis2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Invalid PD claim. Eeekster (talk) 03:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:File_name.ext[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs).

reason 66.54.75.191 (talk) 08:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:250px-DSC044032.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:250px-DSC044032.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission is given as a link to User:4642k, but all of his files were deleted as I4. Stefan2 (talk) 15:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Empire Kosher logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to non-free. I'm not entirely sure if it's copyrightable or not, so I threw a fair use tag on it. Someone does, however, need to write a rationale for this usage. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Empire Kosher logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Reopening per #File:Empire.jpg above: the request was closed by User:AnomieBOT after User:Nyttend deleted a few revisions and moved the rest. It seems less confusing to restart. Is this copyrightable or not? Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that; it didn't occur to me that the bot would close it. Nyttend (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Flag of Muzakaj.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Muzakaj.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Not own work as stated. Might be in the PD due to its age (not given). Leyo 16:13, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Judging by the article in which it's used, this family existed centuries ago. I'd say that it's either a copy of a centuries-old design or a self-made depiction of a centuries-old blazon. Nyttend (talk) 16:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chen Jing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chen Jing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:ITTF. Leyo 16:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ITTF mantains a database of images. They state that the use of those images is free, but the source should be mentioned. In this case, I have mentioned the source, therefore the image can be considered as free use. (Cialo (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:350px-University of Denver Mary Reed.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:350px-University of Denver Mary Reed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"Permission: You may not use this picture." Stefan2 (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:350px-University of Denver University Hall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:350px-University of Denver University Hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"Permission: You may not use this image." Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:800px-Campo Imperatore 02.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:800px-Campo Imperatore 02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that this comes from it:File:Campo Imperatore 02.jpg. It says that the Italian copy was deleted as not being covered by the EDP, so maybe the file is unfree? Stefan2 (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:5182003675 1659530065 31251654 7701429 n.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:5182003675 1659530065 31251654 7701429 n.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Overwritten file: two in one. Typical Facebook file name. This could mean that the images have been stolen from Facebook. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:450px-Poznan europe.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:450px-Poznan europe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Comes from Estonian Wikipedia where it was deleted as "Staatus ebaselge". The licence requires attributing the photographer, but no photographer is listed on English Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:438px-Kallerupstenen 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:438px-Kallerupstenen 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that the source was da:Fil:Kallerupstenen 2.JPG which was deleted because it didn't have any licence. Stefan2 (talk) 18:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Steve Brown, GB Wheelchair Rugby Captain.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steve Brown, GB Wheelchair Rugby Captain.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

License at http://www.w-w-i.com/paralympicsgb/preview.php?id=00059920&pg=1&cx=7&gp=i&pp=24 is not compatible. Eeekster (talk) 23:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing out a possible Copyright issue with this image. I have written permission (which can be provided) to use the image from the Copyright holder who has designated the image free to use for editorial purposes. I and he believe Wikipedia and other online resources fall into this category. Perhaps I have not categorised the upload correctly and would appreciate guidance if this is the case. --KentishGirl (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Please make sure that the permission is sent to [email protected], and check WP:CONSENT to confirm that the permission is sufficient. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.