Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 March 12

< March 11	March 13 >

March 12

File:Hidacow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hidacow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hidacow.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DreamFA.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - License amended. Danger ^{High voltage!} 02:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DreamFA.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

"Only I can use it, unless you ask me" contradicts with CC-BY-SA 3.0. Also no evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 02:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it...please take it off. DreamFieldArts (talk) 21:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm not 100% convinced that the background image is the work of the uploader. Can you please provide the original image to verify that it is your work? — ξ ^xplicit 05:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've notified the uploader of Explicit's request. Danger ^{High voltage!} 23:57, 22 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:John hackett.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John hackett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unknown source and author contradicts the claim it's PD because it's a British government image. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 10:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BugglesColour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BugglesColour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that this is {{PD-US-no notice}}, but the people depicted are Londoners and there is no evidence that it was out of copyright in the UK on 1 January 1996, nor that it was first or simultaneously published in the US. Stefan2 (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PISA 2009 Mathematics.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Concerns seem to have been addressed. — ξ ^xplicit 05:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PISA 2009 Mathematics.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

My guess is that the uploader only filled in the colours for the different countries and that this is based on a different, unidentified, map. This map needs to be identified and checked for licence compatibility with CC-Zero as specified here. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The colors is based on the classification of nations in the data tables. Here is one: [1]. There is another for the "Plus Results" for some additional nations.[2] (page 42, all new nations stated to be statistically below the OECD average). There is no map. Acadēmica Orientālis (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Made the sources clearer in the description. Acadēmica Orientālis (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - The only thing which needs a source is the map which is still unsourced. Filling in colours at various places is ineligible for copyright. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Not sure I understand. Sources given above. The color classification is based on the same classification of the different nations in the sources. Wikipedia has many similar world maps based on data tables. One example: [3] Acadēmica Orientālis (talk) 14:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Made the sources clearer. Also included the blank map used based on the model of the "Index of perception of corruption 2009" map linked to above. Acadēmica Orientālis (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - The map listed as a source appears to be a different map. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        Corrected. Acadēmica Orientālis (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Screaming Piha Sign.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screaming Piha Sign.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a copyrightable sign in the U.S. (only in countries like Germany would this not be a copyright violation, commons:commons:Freedom of panorama) —innotata 15:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TCDRS Assest Allocation Jan2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TCDRS Assest Allocation Jan2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Technically, only a CC-ND licence would be required for the specified purpose. No evidence that this is in the public domain as far as I can see. Might be PD-ineligible. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Texas Government Code, Title 5; Subtitle Open Government, Ethics; Subtitle 552 Public Information; Subchapter A. General Provisions; Sec. 552.0038 [4]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TCDRS Asset Allocation Jan2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TCDRS Asset Allocation Jan2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Technically, only a CC-ND licence would be required for the specified purpose. No evidence that this is in the public domain as far as I can see. Might be PD-ineligible. Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mediated cross-border communication - dimensions of analysis.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mediated cross-border communication - dimensions of analysis.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

This was tagged as CC-BY-NC-ND and deleted as F9. It was reuploaded 10 minutes later as CC-BY-NC-ND, so I requested F9 deletion again. The uploader has now changed CC-BY-NC-ND into CC-BY-SA (no version number specified) in the licence section, but there is still a link to a CC-BY-NC-ND licence in the permission field in the information template. No evidence of permission from the author, but the uploader claims to have permission which at least covers Wikipedia on the file talk page (unclear if it covers something else). Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Festivalhall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Festivalhall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be from this message board post that predates the upload: http://www.zappa.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8966&start=200 Mosmof (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Amanda Lamb.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanda Lamb.JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Up for deletion on Commons since a few days ago: Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amanda Lamb.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ideaworkshop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ideaworkshop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Computer screenshot. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Switcher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Switcher.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Computer screenshot. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Creativewriter1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Creativewriter1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Computer screenshot. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LACI logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ ^xplicit 01:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LACI logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No licence. Probably eligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Amity-collection-truck.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amity-collection-truck.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious own work; it sounds as if the user might just have scanned this. Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Machine-shop-John-St.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Machine-shop-John-St.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious own work; it sounds as if the user might just have scanned this. Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Craftsman-loom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craftsman-loom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious own work; it sounds as if the user might just have scanned this. Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Refurbished-stoves.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Refurbished-stoves.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious own work; it sounds as if the user might just have scanned this. Stefan2 (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1423-main-st-east.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1423-main-st-east.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious own work; it sounds as if the user might just have scanned this. Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Thomas Bell-Wright International Consultants Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Image does not meet the threshold of originality. — ξ ^xplicit 01:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Bell-Wright International Consultants Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence of permission but is this eligible for copyright in the first place? Stefan2 (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated this with tags, can you verify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drd tbw (talk • contribs) 04:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ariel view of havant station.PNG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ariel view of havant station.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

If this is from an online satellite imagery provider, it is likely to be copyrighted and therefore not free. Cloudbound (talk) 22:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ems.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ems.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

There are three files. The first two have no source and no licence. The last one has no evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:How LVDS Works 22Feb12.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:How LVDS Works 22Feb12.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

From the uploader's statement this appears to be work for hire and not his property. TI would have to assign the license. Eeekster (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.