Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 25
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < January 24 | January 26 > |
|---|
January 25
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FBD logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Current licence is obviously wrong. I'm doubting that the angel is simple enough for it to qualify as
{{PD-ineligible-USonly|the United Kingdom}}. Stefan2 (talk) 01:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CinnamonOverview.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of Banshee (media player) (MIT), Cinnamon (user interface) (GPL) and LibreOffice (LGPL). Licence incompatibility problem? Stefan2 (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Afro-American.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- montage of multiple images; although the individual pics are listed with claimed copyright status, no sources are given to be able to prove these. Without the sources, no way to confirm the (c) status of each image Skier Dude (talk) 06:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- montage of multiple images; although the individual pics are listed with claimed copyright status, no sources are given to be able to prove these. Without the sources, no way to confirm the (c) status of each image Skier Dude (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Asian-Hispanic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- montage of multiple images; although the individual pics are listed with claimed copyright status, no sources are given to be able to prove these. Without the sources, no way to confirm the (c) status of each image Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- montage of multiple images; although the individual pics are listed with claimed copyright status, no sources are given to be able to prove these. Without the sources, no way to confirm the (c) status of each image Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- montage of multiple images; although the individual pics are listed with claimed copyright status, no sources are given to be able to prove these. Without the sources, no way to confirm the (c) status of each image Skier Dude (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eagle Horst 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Bringing this here because of the multiple copyright tags that have been placed on this image; source provided, but the US-mil templates do not seem to be appropriate. Hopefully a correct license can be agreed upon Skier Dude (talk) 06:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Orangemike (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Christ in the Temple.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Painting attributed to a painter who died in 1963, but tagged with "self|cc-by-sa". Lacking explanation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Appears to be a newspaper scan from the credits on the left top —SpacemanSpiff 10:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Tungi Mailefihi and the student at Tupou College. Front Row starting from left; Viliami Tupoulahi (Tungi Mailefihi), Sione Havea, Lotima. Back row left; 'Ikani Taliai, Tevita Kata Nau II, Suliasi Tolu and Lesinali Tovo.JPG
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tungi Mailefihi and the student at Tupou College. Front Row starting from left; Viliami Tupoulahi (Tungi Mailefihi), Sione Havea, Lotima. Back row left; 'Ikani Taliai, Tevita Kata Nau II, Suliasi Tolu and Lesinali Tovo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unlikely that it is an work by the uploader as claimed. The date is definitively incorrect. Please also review the three other uploads. Leyo 13:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- File:Hessen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Photographed by the author using Fuji Proplus 100 with Yashica Electro 35 GSN in daylight without flash" but EXIF says "Camera manufacturer: AgfaPhoto GmbH". It looks as if the uploader might have tried to pretend to be the photographer by mentioning a camera model in the description but that he picked the wrong one. Note that the file has been overwritten and that I haven't looked at the EXIF for the first version. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- For what it's worth, a Yashica Electro 35 is a film camera. Agfa d-lab.2/3 would, I believe, be a scanner. (In other words, the EXIF data appears consistent with the uploaders claim.) --dave pape (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I see. So no problem, then. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- For what it's worth, a Yashica Electro 35 is a film camera. Agfa d-lab.2/3 would, I believe, be a scanner. (In other words, the EXIF data appears consistent with the uploaders claim.) --dave pape (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gate4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution and no EXIF. Uploader has lots of copyright notices on his talk page. Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Macshield.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Does freedom of panorama really apply to this sign? Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging. Acather96 (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Drifter Chocolate Bar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging. Bad quality makes this unencyclopedic aswell. Acather96 (talk) 20:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I don know the correct procedure to follow. But I took this photo, if that helps? b0sh
- A tricky situation. The product was apparently created by Rowntree's (from the UK) but is now produced by Nestlé (from Switzerland). The packaging mentions Nestlé, but maybe it should still be seen as a British product? Commons:COM:TOO#Switzerland is more or less the opposite of Commons:COM:TOO#UK! --Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chomp Chocolate Bar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized deriative work of product/packaging. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging. Acather96 (talk) 20:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging - only used in userspace. Acather96 (talk) 20:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1910 c1910s-30s Bowler hat by Scotts of London and Calhoun's of Canada.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image author only allows non-derivative work, only used in userspace. Acather96 (talk) 20:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1910 c1910s-30s Bowler hat by Scotts of London and Calhoun's of Canada prv.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image author only allows non-derivative, only used in userspace Acather96 (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging, only used in userspace. Acather96 (talk) 20:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.