Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 22
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < January 21 | January 23 > |
|---|
January 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pole vault.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphaned image's description says it is a picture of the uploader's "vault taken by myself" I'm not an expert, but how do you take a picture of yourself while polevaulting? -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WhiteJM91ED0107 818.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file information page suggests copyvio from [1] although I can't find it there. Stefan2 (talk) 09:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WhiteJM91ED0108 819.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file information page suggests copyvio from [2] although I can't find it there. Stefan2 (talk) 09:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WIU-QC.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Obviously made by the Western Illinois University but there is no source for its Creative Commons licence. Stefan2 (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JonathanEmile2009.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the licence is correct. The specified URL gives me a 404 and I can't find a working copy using the Waybackmachine. Stefan2 (talk) 09:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Orim M. Meikle 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Scanned from promotional images" so unlikely free. Stefan2 (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Collage of 12 images but the gallery in the {{Information}} template only shows 11 images, so one image must be unsourced. Also note that two of the images have been reported as possibly unfree (see #File:JonathanEmile2009.JPG and #File:Orim M. Meikle 2007.jpg above). Stefan2 (talk) 09:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I see that the bottom row has been deleted now. The images on the top row look fine, but the old revisions might need to be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This page tells that it was painted in 1922, but there is no year of publication listed. Unless published in the same year, it might be unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 09:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BobMelvinAs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File information page suggests copyvio from [3] but I can't find it there. Stefan2 (talk) 09:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Abbaspurnew.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I tagged this as "no source". The uploader later deleted the "no source" tag but didn't add any source. Stefan2 (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This image was provided by a friend who took it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs) 13:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC) riz 15:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And did your friend approve to distributing it under the specified licence? I notice that the licence requires attributing the photographer, but this is impossible since the photographer is unknown. This might be a problem. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Saltprocessingsmall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Looks a bit dodgy, besides self-gfdl tag there's no real claim of ownership. Also has a black border which may indicate that it has been copied off a website. Acather96 (talk) 11:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Crowded old town.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No real claim of ownership besides self-gfdl tag, obviously a scan due to quality/borders. Acather96 (talk) 11:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rockmen guardians.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- For subtle copyright reasons, 1987 U.S. statues need evidence that they, or an authorized image or other copy of them (advertisement, pamphlet, photo, postcard, statuettes, etc.), was distributed to another party (sold, given, shown in an ad, etc.) at least once before March 1, 1989 without a copyright notice. Closeapple (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if this work is not free, it could be reduced and used under fair use. However, someone might be able to find a pre-1990 copy of these statues that makes them public domain, so that this photograph is also free. Long explanation: Sculpture does not have freedom of panorama in the United States, so we have to consider the copyright status of the sculpture itself. The Rockmen Guardians were built by Terese Agnew in 1987 according to Roadside America or 1987–1988 (SIRIS IAS 66830011). Because of a 1978 law, this 1987 work would have been under the 5-year time to register copyright, when a 1989 law went into effect and made registration unnecessary, according to Commons:Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US#1978 to March 1, 1989. However: The 1978–1989 law also said that public display of a work, without transferring it, was not "publication". So, in short: If the sculptures, or an authorized photograph, statuette, or other authorized copy of the work, was sold, given, or otherwise distributed to someone, before March 1, 1989 without a copyright notice on it, then the statues are public domain. Otherwise, they are still under copyright. --Closeapple (talk) 17:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.