Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 2

< January 1	January 3 >

January 2

File:Aureus - Adriano - RIC 0144.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aureus - Adriano - RIC 0144.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says "use under permission", but the sites seem to be "all rights reserved" sites. Stefan2 (talk) 01:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Constantius II 337 361.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constantius II 337 361.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence that the photographer died at least 100 years ago. Stefan2 (talk) 01:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As was the case with another file listed in possibly unfree files, I uploaded this image in 2005 and I did not knew much about Wikipedia licenses in that time. I am not author of that image and I do not remember from where I took it and whether it is really free for use. PANONIAN 15:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although the coin itself is in public domain, it is a 3D object, so the potographer gets a copyright and should be acknowledged. The image is not used on any page anyway. Cambalachero (talk) 13:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Word Lens Demo 23Dec2010.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Word Lens Demo 23Dec2010.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Screenshot from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2OfQdYrHRs, which is under the Standard Youtube License. Prof. Professorson (talk) 08:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-free screenshot. Being part of a commercial, it is basically guaranteed that the video is not free. Cambalachero (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Word Lens Logo 23Dec2010.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Word Lens Logo 23Dec2010.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Non-free logo. Prof. Professorson (talk) 08:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It is not simple enough to go for PD-Text Cambalachero (talk) 13:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PT19 EL-2000-00262.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PT19 EL-2000-00262.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source is dead :( Bulwersator (talk) 09:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Replaced source with a workin NASA link. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 14:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Bulwersator (talk) 14:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JNES.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:JNES.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

I dispute "contains no original authorship" part Bulwersator (talk) 09:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: it includes part of the Windows XP interface, under copyright by Microsoft Cambalachero (talk) 13:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Scarlett Johansson 2003 film.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scarlett Johansson 2003 film.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

While the flickr source gives a CC license there are a lot of tineye hits and the image appears to be a professional portrait. Eeekster (talk) 10:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marilyn Monroe Blonde.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marilyn Monroe Blonde.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Likely copyvio at Flickr, Flickr uploader admits that the images in this collection were "mostly found on Tumblr". January (talk) 10:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mehrdad Pooladi.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mehrdad Pooladi.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The exif data makes me doubt this is the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 10:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Johansson Louis Vuitton.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johansson Louis Vuitton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This Louis Vuitton ad is sourced to a website that gives this Flickr upload as the source. The copyright presumably belongs to Louis Vuitton and/or photographer, I doubt the Flickr uploader has authority to release it under a free license. January (talk) 11:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HMS C8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMS C8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

From source: © Walker Archive. Bulwersator (talk) 11:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Isn't it too old to be protected?.. Pibwl ←« 15:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Maybe, but there is no info in source that somebody from Navy was author of this photo Bulwersator (talk) 12:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TejaswiniPandit1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TejaswiniPandit1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged as uploader's work but also says "Photo taken by Sushant". Eeekster (talk) 11:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Asteroids dust microscopic photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asteroids dust microscopic photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Without source :( Bulwersator (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Eastern South Australia Satellite Photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eastern South Australia Satellite Photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Without source :( Bulwersator (talk) 13:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Placenta ad in Hong Kong.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Placenta ad in Hong Kong.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

From commons deletion request "The photo itself might be free, but the contents of the poster is someone else's original composition, and there is no evidence that the ad is not copyrighted. Sven Manguard (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)" Bulwersator (talk) 15:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As this is a request at commons, delete the local file and don't get the same discussion 2 times. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 00:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gallery Front Room.jpg et al

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gallery Front Room.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Gallery Steps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Gallery Vestibule.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:DG Collector's Room.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photos of "The Disney Gallery". Copyright probably belongs to Disney. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alfredo di stefano1947 cropped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfredo di stefano1947 cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Derivative work of File:Alfredo di stefano1947.jpg and File:Alfredo di stefano.jpg, both deleted in Commons for lacking a clear source. Remember to check in Commons to see the logs, just clicking here will show the empty local logs at this project (because no file was uploaded locally, nor the file pages created for any other reason) Cambalachero (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arabitt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Maxim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arabitt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Considering the uploader's history this image isn't likely to be his work. Eeekster (talk) 22:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gallery.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gallery.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of art gallery - only things to note are two 2D images - unlikely to have permission Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GalleryShowsCollage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GalleryShowsCollage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

collage of images of 2D artwork Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Galuppi-Burano.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galuppi-Burano.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Italy has yet (if they ever bother) follow EU laws on Freedom of panorama, so there is none. This statue looks modern. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.