Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < February 2 | February 4 > |
|---|
February 3
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY (TALK) 08:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dubious {{own}} and {{self}}. Stefan2 (talk) 01:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep after I changed the license to {{non-free logo}} with a rationale, and placed it on an article. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Scuttle's Scooters.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I think that this image shows quite a lot of outdoor artworks at Tōkyō Disneyland. Artworks are unfree per commons:COM:FOP#Japan. Stefan2 (talk) 01:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree, delete. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Similar image on Commons: Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scuttle's Scooters at Tokyo DisneySea.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
,_in_Hot_Rod_Girl.jpg){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:Roxanne Arlen and Eddie Ryder (1956), in Hot Rod Girl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is obviously not pre-1923 since it is from 1956. No indication that the film is in the public domain. en:File:Hot Rod Girl FilmPoster.jpeg is a film poster for the film and is marked as being fair use. Stefan2 (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing immediately as the nomination was a mistake: it says no renewal. I will fix the licence to state that. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Which country is this and does freedom of panorama really apply? File:Survival of the fattest.jpg shows the artwork in China and this page shows the same artwork at various places in Denmark. Denmark has too restricted freedom of panorama for artworks for Commons. Since the statue seems to be moving once in a while, I don't think that it is correct to state that it is permanently located somewhere, which is a requirement for freedom of panorama to apply in most countries, except possibly for the People's Republic of China where the permanent requirement doesn't seem to apply. Stefan2 (talk) 01:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IEEE plaque NYer-Hotel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is this too long for {{PD-text}}? Stefan2 (talk) 01:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Too long? Long text is still text Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- But only short sections are short enough to be {{PD-text}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Too long? Long text is still text Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DPRK Passpot (1950s).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I doubt that this goes under Article 12 of the copyright law; the passport is likely copyrighted, unless the author died at least 50 years ago. Stefan2 (talk) 02:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The picture of the passport is taken by me, hence tagged as released to the public. As for the artwork of the passport itself, if the emblem of the DPRK is subject to no copyright as per article 12 of said copyright law, then chances are using it on a document doesn't change that. Not to mention there is another image of a modern DPRK passport that is not subject to any kind of deletions. Seralys (talk) 04:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that the picture is subject to article 12. The only legal documents it seems to apply to are "laws and ordinances" (법령), "decisions" (결정) and "directives" (지시) (summarised as "state management documents" / 국가관리문건) and this looks like some other kind of legal document. The words "such as" in the English translation are, I believe, not entirely correctly translated from the original Korean, which uses the word wikt:같은. See also wikt:같다 for the dictionary form of the verb where more information is available. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Centennial logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- dubious "This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. This applies worldwide." Bulwersator (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2011 kcr-logo 300dpi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- dubious "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License." Bulwersator (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BB7 on the Torch 9860.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 09:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ferentillo-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- dubious "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.", (there is unclear note "see user:Attilios[odp] talk for images from www.araldicacivica.it"), web resolution Bulwersator (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shimon Cohen Headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- " Bulwersator (talk) 09:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No reason given. I assume that you think that the author ("The PR Office") suggests that it might be unfree and that OTRS is needed to keep this. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Saarang iitm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 09:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Greenwave.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that "This work is irrevocably in the public domain in the United States because it was first published in the United States without copyright notice prior to 1978." Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ishtalinga.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" - web resolution. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Loyola.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There are 3 images packed into one but anyway all are wrong/copyvios/suspected copyvios
- Current revision - without licence
- Old revision - without source that this portrait is really old
- Older revision - revision lost Bulwersator (talk) 09:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The painting is this, isn't it? Claimed to have been done in 1556. Point at the image with the mouse to see the year of creation. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I was right, at least in part with my guess of posthumous portrait :). So old revision may stay, current should be deleted Bulwersator (talk) 03:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The painting is this, isn't it? Claimed to have been done in 1556. Point at the image with the mouse to see the year of creation. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MA Colonna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that this portrait is really old and copyright expired Bulwersator (talk) 09:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- deleted as redundant with copy on Commons. PD-old is correct; authorship info now provided. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Major 18.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "It was made by Don Leon[odp] 16:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)." & "This image is in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States prior to January 1, 1923." Bulwersator (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Week keep It looks like to me that "It was made by Don Leon[odp] 16:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)." was originally typed in as "It was made by ~~~~, which would mean the date in the file description page is the date of the upload from a signature. File is also very similar to File:RWS Tarot 18 Moon.jpg. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~~~ is also confirmed by the edit summary. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Map of Kiev Rus'.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Contains copyrighted text from the Encyclopediaofukraine.com Chaosdruid (talk) 11:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I tagged this as "no licence" and "no permission", but then I looked at the history: the uploader has been removing deletion tags several times. Thus, I am additionally reporting it to PUF so that this file isn't forgotten if the tags are deleted again. This file has no copyright notice and the uploader wrote something which suggests that it is unfree: "It came from Theme Park Insider. Copyright Theme Park Insider" Stefan2 (talk) 14:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dolceforbidden.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This was moved to Commons and then deleted on Commons. I suspect that it should be deleted here too. See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dolceforbidden.JPG and Commons:User talk:Eusebius/Archives/2010#File:Dolceforbidden.JPG. The uploader's talk page is full of messages about source and copyright problems. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.