Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 September 23

< September 22	September 24 >

September 23

File:Jean Sagal M.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean Sagal M.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unused photo. Tagged {{PD-self}}, but also given a fair-use rationale. No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. —Bkell (talk) 05:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mordecai Wyatt Johnson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mordecai Wyatt Johnson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence for the {{PD-US}} claim. —Bkell (talk) 06:04, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Uploads of User:Winston789

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Architek.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Some uploads of this user are watermarked with "not for sale". The user has editwarred to keep the watermarks in. Pictures were taken with an assortment of cameras. MER-C 07:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteLooks like they were taken from an online retailer. Even if uploader is the retailer (unlikely), we'd need an OTRS to confirm. --GrapedApe (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All appear to be taken from on-line catalogues without any evidence of OTRS. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP From memory, the images were taken by one of the moderators at The Fashion Spot (TFS) forum or The Purse Forum (TPF) and are of genuine Louboutin shoes they own. The images as presented on Wikipedia state that the uploader took the photos themselves. The fact they are all posed the same way would support the suggestion the same person took all of the images. The fact that different cameras were used is immaterial when you understand that the different shoe models as presented span at least half a decade. The watermark is used specifically to stop online retailers trying to use the images, and especially to stop Chinese counterfeiters from copying the images and using them to support the sale of their fake goods via ebay and via thousands of Asian websites trading in counterfeit goods, a topic which is regularly discussed at both TFS and TPF. Indeed there's a long thread over there dedicated to indentifying fake products and calling them out as fakes. There is no copyright violation with these images. - 109.176.218.7 (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cropgtugasign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cropgtugasign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Derivative photograph of a copyrighted billboard. GrapedApe (talk) 12:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Smith Armies of the Napoleonic era.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smith Armies of the Napoleonic era.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The file is a copy of a book cover from 2004. It is mostly taken up by a painting which I would expect is in the public domain, however I believe that the cover itself is copyrighted. Nev1 (talk) 13:52, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Non-Slice painting by James Siena 2005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Non-Slice painting by James Siena 2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: source provided by uploader does not find the image nor does searching the site. This image of a painting is a derivative work and requires permission from the copyright holder but there is no evidence of any permission and as it is a modern painting, so it cannot be in the public domain due to its age. ww2censor (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:James Siena Infected Lattice Print 2004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Siena Infected Lattice Print 2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: no source provided by uploader. This image of a painting is a derivative work and requires permission from the copyright holder but there is no evidence of any permission and as it is a modern painting, so it cannot be in the public domain due to its age. ww2censor (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Two Sequences by james siena.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two Sequences by james siena.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: no source provided by uploader. This image of a painting is a derivative work and requires permission from the copyright holder but there is no evidence of any permission and as it is a modern painting, so it cannot be in the public domain due to its age. ww2censor (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Number 4 ink and pencil drawing by james siena.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Number 4 ink and pencil drawing by james siena.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: image of an artwork is a derivative work and requires permission from the copyright holder but there is no evidence of any permission and as it is a modern painting, so it cannot be in the public domain due to its age. ww2censor (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:James siena portrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:James siena portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: image is attributed to the "Billy Farrell Agency" but without any evidence of permission even if they are the copyright holder. CC 3.0 licence was added by the uploader following csd for lack of a copyright tag. ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:New macedonian plates.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:New macedonian plates.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: there is no evidence the copyright applied is valid. According to commons:Commons:L#Macedonia.2C Republic of some government works are freely licenced but it is unlikely this image is covered by that permission. There is a possibility it could be considered for a {{PD-ineligible}} though I doubt it. ww2censor (talk) 16:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sands3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sands3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: unused portrait; unless the uploader is also a professional photographer. I highly doubt the validity of the free licence attached to this image. ww2censor (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kevinsands.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevinsands.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: unless the uploader is also a professional photographer. I highly doubt the validity of the free licence attached to this image. ww2censor (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AutomotiveNews.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AutomotiveNews.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: derivative image of copyright newspaper page without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Attribution claimed by the uploader. ww2censor (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bnu 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bnu 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Club logo, doubt Free Art License claim. Acather96 (talk) 16:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ArtesaniaNica.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArtesaniaNica.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Compliation of possibly non-free images Acather96 (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1916womenpic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1916womenpic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a mural, couldn't find date of creation. Acather96 (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dragonsig22.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dragonsig22.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Doubt this uploader created, seems to be intended for use as a signature, which is if was would directly violate Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sig0urz!3.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sig0urz!3.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Doubt this is uploader created, seems to be intended for use as a signature, if it was this would directly violate Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fieldguide.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete per G7 (non-admin closure). Acather96 (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fieldguide.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a book cover, unauthorized derivative work Acather96 (talk) 17:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dj wurktime.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dj wurktime.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This photo is also located on Photobucket. Unfortunately, Photobucket does not seem to show the upload date, so it is difficult to tell which is a copyvio of which. I'm leaning toward the one hosted here as a copyvio of the photo on Photobucket. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.