Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 November 20

< November 19	November 21 >

November 20[edit]

File:Natalie Wood Wagner.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natalie Wood Wagner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Page 4 of the book this photo was taken from says that all film photos with the exception of a list provided are the property of Turner Entertainment-all rights reserved. This photo is not on the list of exceptions. The book is copyrighted 2006 and says that no part of the book may be reproduced without written permission.
Leading Ladies: The 50 Most Unforgettable Actresses of the Studio Era This photo is shown on page 211 and the copyright information is on page 4. We hope (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The list of exceptions mentioned above does include All the Fine Young Cannibals, the source of the photo. On a side note, for the other images except where a specific copyright is noted, a blanket claim of "property" rights does not act as a copyright notice. Photos require their own individual copyright notice on the photo, and a separate copyright registration. Per Film still, such copyrights for publicity photos was generally not done. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 00:33, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found page 4 on Amazon, not Google Books, and it says that Turner Entertainment or RKO reserves the rights to all images except to a list of movies. Yes, Cannibals is one of them. However, the images to that are not scot-free, but are stated as belonging to Turner Entertainment Co. et al (there are several other owners listed after that). This is quite a notable movie with notable stars, so I would not be surprised if this iconic photo of two major stars was indeed copyrighted. ScottyBerg (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Winston logo.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Winston logo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo from Winston Cup racing from the 1990s. User:Talladega87 is certainly not the creator of this image, nor is he authorized to release it as cc-by-sa-3.0. GrapedApe (talk) 03:42, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nom, not correctly licensed. Mt king ^(edits) 02:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hebronite Kippah.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hebronite Kippah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be lifted from http://www.israel1shop.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=42_74&products_id=202&osCsid=75cb431997ca36dfef6a930b57b7e064 Eeekster (talk) 05:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if the picture will not be deleted I'm interested if it could remain on where I posted it. (Even though this picture is not from my website) Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by YehudaMizrahi (talk • contribs) 06:27, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I just uploaded a picture on wikipedia but before adding it to an Israeli or Jewish Culture article, I wanted to make sure with you first whether I can put it on or not because this is what the permission of this picture said, according to wikipedia:

"This work or image is now in the public domain because its term of copyright has expired in Israel. According to Israel's copyright statute from 2007 (translation), a work is released to the public domain on 1 January of the 71st year after the author's death (paragraph 38 of the 2007 statute) with the following exceptions: A photograph taken on 24 May 2008 or earlier — the old British Mandate act applies, i.e. on 1 January of the 51st year after the creation of the photograph (paragraph 78(i) of the 2007 statute, and paragraph 21 of the old British Mandate act). If the copyrights are owned by the State, not acquired from a private person, and there is no special agreement between the State and the author — on 1 January of the 51st year after the creation of the work (paragraphs 36 and 42 in the 2007 statute)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by YehudaMizrahi (talk • contribs) 06:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MCA-Exhibit-5-January-2007.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MCA-Exhibit-5-January-2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

There are a number of copyrightable elements within the work (the posters; the statues), and I do not think they are likely to be de minimis, as the picture has no purpose without them and is being used to illustrate the tower represented by the statue. While I don't have any doubt that the uploader is the photographer and can release his creativity in the photo, I am not sure he can license the image as a whole as I fear it is a derivative work. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a per Moonriddengirl. Mt king ^(edits) 04:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arnold Toynbee.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arnold Toynbee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arnold Toynbee 1.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Correct. Even though the underlying piece might be PD-old (not sure about that country's copyright particulars), the photograph of the 3D artwork is 100% copyrightable and belongs to the photographer, who in this case has not released it.--GrapedApe (talk) 22:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.