Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 May 7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
May 7
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Derivative of http://conservation.catholic.org/ourladyweb.jpg. Web Archive (http://replay.web.archive.org/20070409060417/http://conservation.catholic.org/bible_2.htm) shows original was around before WP picture uploaded. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- unused photo; user does not own copyright to source Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Dcoetzee (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fulldekklogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This looks like an organisational logo, uploader claims a PD release, but doesn't provide other details. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Onassis 1963 pink suit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims this image was the product of the U.S. Federal government but provides no evidence to support this claim. Image source is given as a URL to a JPEG file from the site www.handbag.com (can be accessed from this html page). The listed source site contains standard boilerplate claiming copyright while providing no indication as to who created the image. Further web searches locates this copy of the image, identical except for a digital watermark, with full source information showing the picture was taken by a press photographer. --Allen3 talk 11:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pity, as the pink is much more vivid than in the replacement image. Ericoides (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Italeri Mig-37B.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims this is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License, but he gives the web site where he got it from and there's no indication there that it has been so released -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - appears to be box art/instructions from plastic model kit - as such it would be copyrighted.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Firefox03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims this is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License, but he gives the web site where he got it from and there's no indication there that it has been so released. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.