Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 May 29
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
May 29
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:152 front cover grand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- film screenshot, specific film not provided, can't be pd-self Skier Dude (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Enphcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover, not public domain, website [1] clearly claims (c) Skier Dude (talk) 06:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eecover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover, not PD, website [2] requires 'rights & permissions' Skier Dude (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gfpjcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not PD; website [3] requires 'rights & permissions' Skier Dude (talk) 06:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stpcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not pd; product of Florida state Uni; no source provided, link to site [4] is not helpful for (c) status Skier Dude (talk) 06:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Etudphencover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not pd & uploader is not the author; site [5] indicates (c) held by Centre d’Études Phénoménologiques Skier Dude (talk) 06:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Faithphilcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not pd; (c) held by Society of Christian Philosophers Skier Dude (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Philtopcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not pd; (c) most likely held by Univ of Arkansas Skier Dude (talk) 06:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Owlcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not pd; (c) most likely held by Hegel Society of America Skier Dude (talk) 06:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Questionscover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- newsletter/journal; not pd; (c) most likely held by [http://depts.washington.edu/nwcenter/ Northwest Center for Philosophy for Children
or University of Washington Department of Philosophy] Skier Dude (talk) 06:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Philtheocover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not pd; (c) most likely held by Marquette University or the Karl Rahner Society Skier Dude (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ajscover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; not pd; uploader is not (c) holder; (c) most likely held by journal publishers Skier Dude (talk) 06:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Epochecover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; uploader not c) holder; (c) held by journal publisher Skier Dude (talk) 06:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jprcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; uploader is not (c) holder; (c) holder is journal publisher Skier Dude (talk) 06:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ijapcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; uploader is not (c) holder; (c) held by journal publisher Skier Dude (talk) 06:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sptcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; uploader is not (c) holder; (c) held by journal publisher or NASSP Skier Dude (talk) 06:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Technecover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; uploader is not (c) holder; (c) held by journal publisher / Society for Philosophy and Technology Skier Dude (talk) 07:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Studneocover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- journal cover; uploader is not (c) holder; (c) held by journal publisher Skier Dude (talk) 07:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Afw 2006 poster art.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be publication of 'Art of Food & Wine Palm Desert festival' Art of Food & Wine Palm Desert and not a work of the uploader Skier Dude (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The uploader was Nasib Bitar, who died in February 2011. The author of the book appears to be a relative, though on paper it is still a copyright violation, assuming the copyright of the book has not expired. CT Cooper · talk 09:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Album cover front.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- claims to be album cover, no source, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AlcatrazMedialogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- corporate logo for Alcatraz Media, Inc., no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Alcheringa logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- logo for Alcheringa (festival), unlikely uploader is (c) holder or it was released as pd; no source Skier Dude (talk) 07:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cover of Pir Baba.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Amoresque cd album .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- given title, appears to be cd album cover - no source- unlikely uploader is (c) holder, if legit cover Skier Dude (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- given title, it's a cd /album cover, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Alternativegfcover.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- used as album cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Americanfaustposter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- film poster, no source, if legit, uploader wouldn't be the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GigiStone1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- given blur & partial border, appears to be taken from another site (or a screenshot); no source given Skier Dude (talk) 07:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Areapal log inshot.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- web/screenshot from Areapal - uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Aof-album-cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover, source does not substantiate 'pd-self' claims Skier Dude (talk) 07:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1945 Album Cover.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- given title, appears to be cd album cover - no source- unlikely uploader is (c) holder, if legit cover Skier Dude (talk) 07:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1945band.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- compilation of five images - no source given for any of them (same uploader as previous album cover) Skier Dude (talk) 07:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I deleted this as CSD F5, but the uploader quite properly pointed out to be that that criterion did not apply. Was tagged as CSD F9, but as there is a non-free use rationale, I do not believe that applies either. Would like further eyes on it to determine whether it does meet the NFCC criteria. As nominator, I have no opinion on this one. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The source for this file is listed as Trekmovie.com. Trekmovie.com has no affiliation with any part of the Star Trek franchise and does not have the authority to release the photo for use in any way. Aside from the fact that it is copyrighted material, the picture itself does not improve the quality of the article in which it was placed nor does it provide the reader with any greater understanding of Spock. Erikeltic (Talk) 11:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note:
- The image in question is not the same as the one from Trekmovie.com - it is derivative of that image, having been extensively cropped and reduced in resolution. This is no different than had I taken a screen cap from my Star Trek DVD, cropped it and reduced it in resolution, and then uploaded it under the appropriate licence, which is also allowed in the English wikipedia. -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 13:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The article in which the image is used is an entry on the fictional character Spock. Over the 30+ years of that character's development, the 2009 Star Trek movie is the first time that an actor other than Leonard Nimoy has portrayed this character in the officially licensed media from CBS/Paramount. Furthermore, it is quite clear that Spock's childhood is an important stage in the character's fictional history. The Kogan as Spock image illustrates both of these. -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 13:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Irrelevant. The source is copyrighted and should not be used in any (barely) derivative form. Erikeltic (Talk) 13:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This claim that "the 2009 'Star Trek' movie is the first time that an actor other than Leonard Nimoy has portrayed this character in the officially licensed media from CBS/Paramount" is false. In addition to Nimoy, Spock has also been portrayed by Carl Stevens, Vadia Potenza, Stephen Manley and Joe W. Davis in the films, Billy Simpson in one animated series episode, and at least one uncredited actor from the Peter Pan Records LPs in the 1970s. This line of reasoning, that the image of Kogan is therefore necessary because he's the first actor to play Spock other than Nimoy in licensed productions, is not only incorrect, but completely misinformed. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- All of which were non-speaking roles and which represented the rapidly aging Spock under the influence of the Genesis planet in ST:III - and none of them were actual portrayals of Spock's life (unlike Kogan). The rest of appearances are just as trivial - on that basis, you should include Frank Welker, as well. For the average viewer it's Kogan and Quinto that they would identify. -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 19:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Trivial to you, perhaps - others take a different view. I've noticed you seem to have a problem with accepting that people disagree might disagree with you and not give you the result you want. However, your original statement about Kogan was in error. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "I've noticed you seem to have a problem with accepting that people disagree might disagree with you" It takes two (or three, or four ....) to tango. Seems to me that Erik (and now you) have just as hard a time accepting that people may not agree with you. And if you want to include the "other" Spocks in the article, feel free, unless you think they're not worth mentioning? -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Trivial to you, perhaps - others take a different view. I've noticed you seem to have a problem with accepting that people disagree might disagree with you and not give you the result you want. However, your original statement about Kogan was in error. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- All of which were non-speaking roles and which represented the rapidly aging Spock under the influence of the Genesis planet in ST:III - and none of them were actual portrayals of Spock's life (unlike Kogan). The rest of appearances are just as trivial - on that basis, you should include Frank Welker, as well. For the average viewer it's Kogan and Quinto that they would identify. -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 19:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This claim that "the 2009 'Star Trek' movie is the first time that an actor other than Leonard Nimoy has portrayed this character in the officially licensed media from CBS/Paramount" is false. In addition to Nimoy, Spock has also been portrayed by Carl Stevens, Vadia Potenza, Stephen Manley and Joe W. Davis in the films, Billy Simpson in one animated series episode, and at least one uncredited actor from the Peter Pan Records LPs in the 1970s. This line of reasoning, that the image of Kogan is therefore necessary because he's the first actor to play Spock other than Nimoy in licensed productions, is not only incorrect, but completely misinformed. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So if I modified a screen cap, how would that be any different? And which, FYI, is the basis under which the primary Spock image in this article is licensed -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 13:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- We are not talking about the primary Spock image, so rather than allow this discussion degenerate into something it isn't I will let my earlier comments stand. You can look at the fair use rationale for the primary picture yourself. Erikeltic (Talk) 13:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You're the one disputing licensing. You can't cherry pick the one image out of three, just because I happened to be the uploader and you want to make a point by nominating it for deletion -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 13:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Once again, the burden of proof for its use is on you, not me. To quote WP policy (again), "It is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." So I'm not going to make your arguments for you and I am not going to drag other files into the discussion. Sorry. Erikeltic (Talk) 14:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And in response to your assertions re: Burden of Proof (again) - we've already addressed that. There is a NFCC rationale provided - the F9 you originally used to justifty the deletion nomination was deemed to be incorrect by the admin - so why don't you try again? -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If you call the rationale you've listed your "burden of proof" then there is no need to discuss this further. Your statements are not convincing (at least to me) and the picture should clearly be deleted. Your rationale has failed to prove anything other than your views. Thank you. Erikeltic (Talk) 17:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Your statements are not convincing (at least to me)" - that much is obvious -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 17:35, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If you call the rationale you've listed your "burden of proof" then there is no need to discuss this further. Your statements are not convincing (at least to me) and the picture should clearly be deleted. Your rationale has failed to prove anything other than your views. Thank you. Erikeltic (Talk) 17:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And in response to your assertions re: Burden of Proof (again) - we've already addressed that. There is a NFCC rationale provided - the F9 you originally used to justifty the deletion nomination was deemed to be incorrect by the admin - so why don't you try again? -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Once again, the burden of proof for its use is on you, not me. To quote WP policy (again), "It is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." So I'm not going to make your arguments for you and I am not going to drag other files into the discussion. Sorry. Erikeltic (Talk) 14:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You're the one disputing licensing. You can't cherry pick the one image out of three, just because I happened to be the uploader and you want to make a point by nominating it for deletion -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 13:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- We are not talking about the primary Spock image, so rather than allow this discussion degenerate into something it isn't I will let my earlier comments stand. You can look at the fair use rationale for the primary picture yourself. Erikeltic (Talk) 13:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, essentially identical to the results if the editor had taken the original screencap xirself.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- But he didn't and the source is listed as a website that holds no copyright to release. Can we at least attempt to locate the original source? Erikeltic (Talk) 20:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't, but I could. Why waste time on the process when the end result is the same? -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 20:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- But he didn't and the source is listed as a website that holds no copyright to release. Can we at least attempt to locate the original source? Erikeltic (Talk) 20:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kagney linn karter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copyvio from this source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/animenut/4355982296/in/photostream Dismas|(talk) 09:25, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Minkonaing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is from a (c) website who, from the look of the image, do not own the copyright. Not sure how this image can be, as claimed, public domain with the copyright owned by the uploader. Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus.-FASTILY (TALK) 05:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mindthegap.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is from the Hong Kong Metro, so unlikely uploader is copyright holder. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree. Hong Kong Metro (MTR) does not have such graphics available. Self-made using graphics software. Toyotaboy95 (talk) 08:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stonehenge Painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This appears to be a picture of a (presumably) copyrighted mural, so the free license is invalid. Dominic·t 20:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Dominic·t 20:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rabandlineup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is said to be free for any purpose just because it's a downloadable wallpaper from an official website. Damiens.rf 20:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Yukon King.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- A television screenshot, so the PD tag seems spurious. Dominic·t 20:53, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A photo of another (presumably) copyrighted photograph. Dominic·t 20:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.