Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
January 6
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sommerfeld.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Lacking author information. Kelly hi! 00:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nancy Hopkins 99.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I suspect copyright for this article was renewed by the newspaper. This is being relisted after a questionable {{di-no permission}} tag was removed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs), and he suggested that I relist it here. Jsayre64 (talk) 02:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think this is clear-cut enough for speedy, which was why I suggested it come here. I've no opinion on the validity of the license. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Image not found at given source. Kelly hi! 02:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Also File:Sibley Mill Augusta GA Site Plan.gif. Kelly hi! 02:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from original submitter: I amplified the descriptions to address the concern raised. The given page http://loc.gov/pictures/item/ga0342/ leads to the full government report. The drawings submitted to Wikipedia are under the link titled "7 drawings". I didn't give the URL to that sub page because it is VERY long. I used a part of Drawing 1 and all of Drawing 2. Let me know if I can do anything else Hughespj (talk) 22:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The images are not in the public domain, so the license is incorrect. While the LOC is hosting the images as part of a collection, the copyright is held by the company that produced them. Since the images were made in 1977, they are not yet in the public domain.--Danger (talk) 21:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kermit roosevelt.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Publication may be restricted according to record at Library of Congress.[1] Photo not property of donating entity. Kelly hi! 03:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Photographs taken by New York World-Telegram & Sun staff photographers are in the public domain and may be used without restriction.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 18:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The photograph in question does not fall into the public domain portion of the collection; if it did, it would be marked per your link. --Danger (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pampers Billboard in Naulukha Chowk-c.jpeg; nevertheless, may be eligible for fair use (note the commons equivalent is being used at Pampers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)). Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --MGA73 (talk) 23:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Semang.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I'm afraid this is a derivative work; from what I can see, neither is the 3D work in the public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SEAsia,closeUp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see my nomination immediately above this one. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ctoverviewmap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image taken from http://www.cumberlandtrail.org/ct_overview.html, no licensing or copyright information Bms4880 (talk) 14:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The image has been directly copied from a private website without pd or similar licenses.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 18:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Leonidas Thermopylae2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photograph of a modern, presumably copyrighted, statue situated in Greece, a country with only unclear/restrictive Freedom of Panorama rules as per commons:Commons:FoP. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It should be deleted per Law No. 3057/2002.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 18:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Presumably" copyrighted is just a guess, it doesn't mean anything. We also have no indication that the statue is even located in Greece. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athenean (talk • contribs)
- It's the one at Thermopylae, as you can easily find out by comparing it with other photographs of that monument [2]. It was apparently built in 1955, according to our Leonidas I article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Even so, I have a major issue with the "presumably copyrighted". It either is or isn't, which is it? That an image may be copyrighted is not grounds for deletion. That Greece's FoP laws are "unclear" does not mean that there is a violation. Ideally, someone in the Greek government would have to be contacted to clarify this. But deletion on the grounds that the image is "presumably" copyrighted seems a bit heavy-handed. Athenean (talk) 07:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If you don't like the "presumably", just leave it out. It is copyrighted. If it was built in 1955, the copyright belongs to the sculptor or his heirs until 70 years after his death. As for the Greek law, check out the commons page on FoP (and its talk archives, where the Greek situation was extensively discussed). Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Even so, I have a major issue with the "presumably copyrighted". It either is or isn't, which is it? That an image may be copyrighted is not grounds for deletion. That Greece's FoP laws are "unclear" does not mean that there is a violation. Ideally, someone in the Greek government would have to be contacted to clarify this. But deletion on the grounds that the image is "presumably" copyrighted seems a bit heavy-handed. Athenean (talk) 07:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If you mean this discussion [3], it seems to me that it ends without real consensus, Alaniaris' detailed comment notwithstanding. In any case, said image is excruciatingly ugly anyway, I think I have found another one (an ancient sculpture), so this may be moot as far as I'm concerned. Athenean (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Backbase logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly organisational logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mitre Bca Mitre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see Commons:Deletion requests/File:MITRE Bca Mitre.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --MGA73 (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stick wall.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Door6zn8zn-1-.gif Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Iitm.maingate.logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source: "personal copy of IITM CD" - that is the work of IITM, not of the uploader. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Console gameboxes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Cover images central to the photo are not free. RJaguar3 | u | t 23:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Roxannebelt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Description mentions coach took image, but released {{pd-self}} - needs OTRS permission from coach. Admrboltz (talk) 23:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.