Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 28
| < January 27 | January 29 > |
|---|
January 28
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear ADH10, I have not been active on my article for quite a while now as I have been on holiday but am eager to comply as you can see it's been a bumpy road in creating this article and it's been up for a while now and well admired. All the decals and badges on the 44 Website are sited by the Director of Military Heraldry South Africa as public domain. Please indicate under what criteria these are being disputed or supply a reference or dispute source. If I have incorrectly classified them when I uploaded them please indicate the correct stepts / functions / labels and I will correct immediately. Many thanks --Smikect 13:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smikect (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear ADH10, I have not been active on my article for quite a while now as I have been on holiday but am eager to comply as you can see it's been a bumpy road in creating this article and it's been up for a while now and well admired. All the decals and badges on the 44 Website are sited by the Director of Military Heraldry South Africa as public domain. Please indicate under what criteria these are being disputed or supply a reference or dispute source. If I have incorrectly classified them when I uploaded them please indicate the correct stepts / functions / labels and I will correct immediately. Many thanks--Smikect 13:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smikect (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear ADH10, I have not been active on my article for quite a while now as I have been on holiday but am eager to comply as you can see it's been a bumpy road in creating this article and it's been up for a while now and well admired. All the decals and badges on the 44 Website are sited by the Director of Military Heraldry South Africa as public domain. Please indicate under what criteria these are being disputed or supply a reference or dispute source. If I have incorrectly classified them when I uploaded them please indicate the correct stepts / functions / labels and I will correct immediately. Many thanks--Smikect 13:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smikect (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:101 Air Supply 44.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
Dear ADH10, I have not been active on my article for quite a while now as I have been on holiday but am eager to comply as you can see it's been a bumpy road in creating this article and it's been up for a while now and well admired. All the decals and badges on the 44 Website are sited by the Director of Military Heraldry South Africa as public domain. Please indicate under what criteria these are being disputed or supply a reference or dispute source. If I have incorrectly classified them when I uploaded them please indicate the correct stepts / functions / labels and I will correct immediately. Many thanks--Smikect 13:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smikect (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This appears to be a promotional image of the tool. Considering the user's history on Commons (past and present), I doubt this is the work of the uploader. — ξxplicit 04:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the past history of this article, this isn't the uploader's work, but they are the agent of the rights holder. There should have been OTRS confirmation of this, but unfortunately this editor was WP:BITTEN so badly at the start, they've not been since since. Way to go guys! 8-( Andy Dingley (talk) 10:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.