Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < January 25 | January 27 > |
|---|
January 26
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:T-55 ypa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The current licensing template claims, "This template must not be used on its own. To establish PD status it must be used only with an appropriate license template such as {{PD-CroatiaGov}}. You must make sure the file content has been declared as public domain by the laws of the relevant successor state." Logan Talk Contributions 02:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eumeces tetragrammus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- May not be free by Wikipedia standards if only allowed to be used for educational purposes. Kelly hi! 04:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, just delete it. Doesn't appear to be free. Newbie error on my part. Lupo 07:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleted, both because of the uploader request, and because this is a good example of an F3 deletion candidate. Nyttend (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep – Danger (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Unable to verify claimed copyright terms. Kelly hi! 04:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyright terms (bottom of the gallery)
- Original image (uncropped) 71.234.215.133 (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RAYTHEON ASTOR.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unable to verify claimed copyright terms. Kelly hi! 04:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- copyright terms on the Raytheon site. Boiled down, Raytheon owns the photos; photos can be used by news agencies for news-reporting purposes; otherwise they are only for non-commercial, personal use. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Natural uncut diamond.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image found on Diamonds In AR.com, copyright by M.A.P. / Mid-America Prospecting; finder was Glenn Worthington, who was not the uploader 71.234.215.133 (talk) 09:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Image on Flickr is licensed CC BY-NC-ND 2.0, not valid for WP use ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree. NC-ND is non-free. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "This is a screen grab from the courtroom video feed" is not a legal document, it is legally considered a work of art of either the municipality that paid for it, or the private company that did so. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Google-Goggles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I am fairly sure that all of those icons are (c) Google Inc. This is a derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Slq exterior.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Slq opening.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Slq from brisbane river.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- This user has uploaded three different images, all on the same day, all with metadata indictating different cameras, all weird web resolutions, none sourced (e.g., not indicating they were self-created). I indicate these have no proof of the license given below. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. They seem to come from the state library itself. The library uses a crop of this image here. Amada44 talk to me 11:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Gimme danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bolshaya kaluzhskaya 7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly unfree: it is not explained how this is public domain in the United States (necessary for non-fair use hosting on Wikipedia) or in Russia (as would be needed on Commons), but tagged as PD-self. —innotata 22:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Was free at the time of upload, became unfree afterwards. One of my earliest edits/uploads here, hence a misleading pd-self tag. Any replacement photo will be just as unfree. NVO (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.