Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < February 6 | February 8 > |
|---|
February 7
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Viktor Yanukovych official portrait.png Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Imam-Reza.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Martin H. (administrator on commons) has determined images by this author have an unreliable source [1]. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There is also a watermark in the corner of this image that says http://ya-reza.persianblog.ir. —Bkell (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CzechdollS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Sending this here for discussion due to it's history. It was un-licensed at upload, than {{GFDL}}, than CCL 2.5 because, according to the uploader "accreditation required." In 2011 an editor felt it was a derivative work so marked it with {{non-free 3D art}} and {{di-no fair use rationale}}. A few days later another editor removed those, added {{di-no permission}}, the other editor reverted that, that was reverted because "It's middle ground". Even though it was set for deltion is seven days an admin removed it th enext day saying "the tag is only for images whose source isn't the uploader, and this is an own work", that was reverted, and that was reverted with "This is not tagged as non-free." So, the question is twofold - one is what is the source? Who made this doll and is it under copyright and/or trademark? How old? The image is for sure a {{derivative}} work and doubtful the uploader had anything to do with the doll itself other than taking the picture of it. (See also User removing non-free license tags on derivative works ANI and Some images that need fixing) Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless depicted 3D artwork (the doll) is shown to be non-copyrighted. Kelly hi! 02:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Even if considered a derivative work, this is a valid fair use reason when the image is used to discuss the artistic genre or technique of the work of art, and rationale can be easily added. Marokwitz (talk) 08:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No, because it it's a copyrighted derivative work, it can be replaced with a free image per WP:NFCC#1. Kelly hi! 01:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WeeWee Monsieur-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: scan of a copyright comic claimed to be work of the uploader but this editor has admitted he uses Wikipedia as a file storage system per this discussion on his talk page. Unless there is proof that the uploader owns the copyright and provides verifiable permission, this image should be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fartknocker.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: scan of a copyright comic claimed to be work of the uploader but this editor has admitted he uses Wikipedia as a file storage system per this discussion on his talk page. Unless there is proof that the uploader owns the copyright and provides verifiable permission, this image should be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jonandangela.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: scan of a copyright comic claimed to be work of the uploader but this editor has admitted he uses Wikipedia as a file storage system per this discussion on his talk page. Unless there is proof that the uploader owns the copyright and provides verifiable permission, this image should be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jonandbuddy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: scan of a copyright comic claimed to be work of the uploader but this editor has admitted he uses Wikipedia as a file storage system per this discussion on his talk page. Unless there is proof that the uploader owns the copyright and provides verifiable permission, this image should be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 16:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gbbcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: scan of a copyright comic claimed to be work of the uploader but this editor has admitted he uses Wikipedia as a file storage system per this discussion on his talk page. Unless there is proof that the uploader owns the copyright and provides verifiable permission, this image should be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 16:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MelvinBallard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no evidences of publication given by up loader as required by the {{PD-US}} License. Image may be PD, but no evidence is given. Additionally image is no longer used since an image with publication information and PD status is available here. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 17:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.