Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 17
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 17
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cascadiancountry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Doubtful that this is user created, it appears to be a derivative or commercial map. AdmrBoltz 00:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Maxwell Hill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- When uploaded to the Malay Wikipedia, the file was not given a clear license tag. It was made into "PD Maybe" at upload, then changed to fair use at the Malay Wikipedia in October of 2010. This is clearly replaceable. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, the source image on ms is ms:Fail:Blarut41.jpg. --B (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep This picture was obviously taken before 1923 in the US and is thus in the public domain - see Wikipedia:Public_domain#When does copyright expire?
- File:Emmelinebwells.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused image. Source link is bad. Wells died on April 25, 1921. No evidence image is 120 years old as author is missing. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 21:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- permission alleged in upload comments but no OTRS ticket Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 23:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Without an OTRS it is not sufficent permssion. The photo at the photographers website is watermarked, you must create an account to download a non-watermarked version and at the bottom is says "All images © Willie Vass Archive. Editorial download use only. All rights reserved." Also if you click on the "buy prints" link you get a pop up with costs. So, OTRS or a very clear {{cc-by-3.0}} license on that web-page is needed in order to keep this. Soundvisions1 (talk) 22:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I've emailed the uploader with instructions on how to contact OTRS, as he's asserted that permission has been given. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 19:58, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.