Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 December 21
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 21
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY Happy 2012!! 06:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Laxman common-man.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- how the heck can an svg be low resolution?- this file is non-free content and under fair use if and only if it's low res.(SVG-low res!!) Gauravjuvekar (talk) 07:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Svg can be "low resolution", especially in case of graphics like this - it is possible to generate 2000000000000000px picture, but it will look terrible. Bulwersator (talk) 14:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I worked on it per request in Graphics Lab. If it is unusable for wikipedia, feel free to delete the image. Could you legal-savvy guys come in now and then to make sure we're not wasting hours working on things that are not legit requests to start with? Jon C (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There's been discussions about SVGs before, and IIRC they are ok. Official SVGs are preferable, though. – Connormah (talk) 23:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MojaveDesert.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploaded by inactive sysop, without source, is it safe to add "self made"? Bulwersator (talk) 08:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:155 bugle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious claim "created by me" (see File:155 logo.jpg) Bulwersator (talk) 09:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like a photograph of a 3D object, a badge from a uniform, and if there could be copyright in the original, this must be expired (the regiment only existed in 1864). So I assume it's only a matter of who took the photograph; perhaps the deleted file would help in this regard, can it be undeleted or looked at an admin, as the reason for deletion looks dubious? —innotata 17:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:150pxBreth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "This image is a work of a U.S. Marine Corps Marine or employee", without source Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uss proteus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "This image is a work of a sailor or employee of the U.S. Navy, taken or made as part of that person's official duties." without source. Bulwersator (talk) 09:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is here, a likely source, where it is said to be a Navy photo, which should be enough to verify. —innotata 17:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Asana 11 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Magazine cover Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GarfieldCard1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see Commons:Deletion requests/File:GarfieldCard1.JPG Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This page does not currently exist. You can search for this page title in other pages or create this page.Bulwersator (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removed from use-only example of the type offered-delete if necessary. We hope (talk) 16:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GarfieldCard2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- see Commons:Deletion requests/File:GarfieldCard1.JPG Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This page does not currently exist. You can search for this page title in other pages or create this page.Bulwersator (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removed from use-only example of the type offered-delete if necessary. We hope (talk) 16:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I am pretty sure that uploader is not the copyright holder of this work. Maybe it can be tagged as fair use, maybe it is in the public domain. Bulwersator (talk) 16:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Prifly4.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Looks like a profession publicity image probably from the website of Private Fly a subject related to most of this users edits. No metadata MilborneOne (talk) 18:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This it the logo of Yezin Agricultural University in Myanmar. The uploader wanted to license this as PD but needs help. I do not know the copyright laws in Myanmar but perhaps this could also be non-free use if the PD-license is not valid. MGA73 (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Prifly3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Looks like a profession publicity image probably from the website of Private Fly a subject related to most of this users edits. No metadata MilborneOne (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Prifly6.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a lower quality variant of the subjects publicity image (as used on http://twitter.com/PrivateFly) unlikely to be the work of the uploader, orphaned with no metadata MilborneOne (talk) 18:52, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Avocet1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- An artists impression of an aircraft that was never built - unlikley to be pd-self MilborneOne (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Amir nezam house17.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Amir nezam house23.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eynali04.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of a statue. No FOP in Iran. MGA73 (talk) 19:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gonga bashi03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of a statue. No FOP in Iran. MGA73 (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Same statue here:
- --MGA73 (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Khagani park01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of a statue. No FOP in Iran. MGA73 (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mashrouteh park02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of a statue. No FOP in Iran. MGA73 (talk) 19:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mashrouteh park03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of a statue. No FOP in Iran. MGA73 (talk) 19:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.