Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 18 September 20 >

September 19[edit]

File:FNBbranch.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FNBbranch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • I took the image myself months ago, and released it into the public domain. I don't understand why it is being tagged now. Jgera5 (talk) 14:19, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi. The fact that you took the photo doesn't appear to be the issue - it looks like that problem is that you have photographed a logo that is itself copyrighted, and such reproduction might have to abide by the de minimis requirements. 124.120.186.30 (talk) 10:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Sorry, that last comment was by me - Wikipedia had logged me out silently. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]
  • Keep See the de minimis page at Commons that Boing links — it uses File:Louvre at night centered.jpg as an example of an acceptable level of de minimis. It sits at the center of the image, rather than well away from the center like the bank logo in this image, and it's substantially larger than the bank logo is. If the pyramid is de minimis, this logo surely is. Nyttend (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:A330-300 (TSN2).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by TeaDrinker (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A330-300 (TSN2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • It's got the web site it was taken from and a copyright notice on the actual photo -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:A320-200 (CTA2).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by TeaDrinker (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A320-200 (CTA2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • It's got the web site it was taken from and a copyright notice on the actual photo -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Airmekong-bombardier crj-900.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airmekong-bombardier crj-900.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No copyright info given (as already tagged). Uploader has been uploading other non-free images, so the presumption is that they're just grabbing whatever they like from other sites -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:A320-200 (CTA3).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A320-200 (CTA3).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No copyright info, and the uploader has been uploading other apparent copyvio photos. Don't know if the tiny size of this one makes it OK, but having seen the other images, I thought it best bring it here for expert opinion -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:ATR-72(NB).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by TeaDrinker (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATR-72(NB).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No copyright info, and the uploader has been uploading other apparent copyvio photos. Don't know if the tiny size of this one makes it OK, but having seen the other images, I thought it best bring it here for expert opinion -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:A330-300 (ZuA).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A330-300 (ZuA).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No copyright info, and the uploader has been uploading other apparent copyvio photos. Don't know if the tiny size of this one makes it OK, but having seen the other images, I thought it best bring it here for expert opinion -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Map_to_MP.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map to MP.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Map - Style is highly typical of Google. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Caohung A321 vn.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Edgar181 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caohung A321 vn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • User is repeatedly uploading images with no copyright status, and judging by some of the earlier ones he/she seems very unlikely to have the right to use them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:CAA A321(TSN1).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by TeaDrinker (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CAA A321(TSN1).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • User is repeatedly uploading images with no copyright status, and judging by some of the earlier ones he/she seems very unlikely to have the right to use them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:ATR-72-200 (VVNB).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by TeaDrinker (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATR-72-200 (VVNB).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • User is repeatedly uploading images with no copyright status, and judging by some of the earlier ones he/she seems very unlikely to have the right to use them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:ATR-72 (VVNB).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Edgar181 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATR-72 (VVNB).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • User is repeatedly uploading images with no copyright status, and judging by some of the earlier ones he/she seems very unlikely to have the right to use them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Lazystude.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight 0001 12:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lazystude.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
Replica of a 1964 logo, so no renewal is required. Tagged as {{non-free logo}} and non-free content rationale added. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:23, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Terraplane1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 18:40, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terraplane1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
No evidence found of a renewal which would have been required given the date of the design. Underlying badge design, if it ever was copyrighted rather than simply trademarked, is {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hudson Terraplane
It is a cropped close up picture of the logo on the car on the right. I took the pictures about 30 years ago when I worked in Nepal. I don't see why this would be a problem; if I can take a picture of a whole car, then I can take a picture of a logo on that car as well. MH (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, de minimis I see... :-( MH (talk) 19:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused about why this picture might not be allowed... I'm not up on why a picture of a 'car badge' is against rules/laws/etc. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 00:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply: If you took a picture of your living room, with a television turned on, while Twilight:New Moon was being viewed, the overall image could be fine and you could release it into PD. But if somebody cropped out everything but the image of Twilight:New moon and said that resulting image was PD, there would be a problem. There is a misconception that images labeled as "free" that may contain trademarks and other copyrighted material makes everything within the image also free. That is simply not true. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How likely is it that this log is {{PD-Pre1978}})? Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very from the style of the vehicle it is attached to. Probably just pre-WWII I think. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to here to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 18:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:AcRoKnife.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AcRoKnife.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Unused image of an "AcRo Knife". appears to be taken from an online catalog. Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Mazdatitan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mazdatitan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Action butter.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Action butter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Poster Ada Booyens.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster Ada Booyens.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Divebomb-classics.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Uploader has now correctly tagged as non-free. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divebomb-classics.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_September_19&oldid=1073915843"