Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 17
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 17
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sculpture of Lillie Langtry visiting Langtry, TX Picture 1792.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- derivative work; uploader does not give enough information to assert this is free. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not convinced that the work depicted here enjoys copyright protection. See commons:Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?. If the work depicted is {{PD-ineligible}}, as I feel it should be, there's no problem here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- see my previous nomination. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Shop dummies aren't sculptures and the posing and clothing are utilitarian. Could very well be {{PD-ineligible}} and thus there'd be no derivative work aspect here. See commons:Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?. Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- see my previous nominations Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This seems to me to be to be a free licensed photo of a montage which does not qualify for copyright protection due to its industrial and banal components and utilitarian layout. The same components could produce an artwork, if that were the intent, but clearly it wasn't the intent here. See commons:Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?. If the work depicted is {{PD-ineligible}}, as I feel it should be, there's no problem here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Arecibo naic big.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claims that this is a NASA image. However it comes from [1] which in turn states, "Specific rights Apply." The subpage states, "All the images on the APOD page are credited to the owner or institution where they originated. Some of the images are copyrighted and to use these pictures publicly or commercially one must write to the owners for permission. For the copyrighted images, the copyright owner is identified in the APOD credit line (please see the caption under the image), along with a hyperlink to the owner's location." In this case, Cornell University. The NAIC website gallary says, "Note to the media.... You are welcome to download these images for non-profit / non-commercial use. For permissions and credit policies see our "media services and support" page. Please credit all photos with: "courtesy of the NAIC - Arecibo Observatory, a facility of the NSF" Racepacket (talk) 03:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Surfpin website.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- appears to be screenshot from web-page or (c) software - contains multiple logos not de minimis (including "Surfpin") Skier Dude (talk 05:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Banerjee collage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- collage of 9 images, no sources provided for them, therefore impossible to determine actual (c) status Skier Dude (talk 06:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kanchrapara airstrip.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- appears to be satellite image - if so, needs source to prove (c) status Skier Dude (talk 06:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Db card.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Card artwork is not uploaders Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AirDubaiWonderAge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Commerical advertisment or album cover? Either way I'm not sure this can be licensed as self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nokia 2680 slide Blue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Product design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Very unlikely to be eligible for copyright protection in the United States. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: It appears to be a press/publicity shot released by Nokia and taken from O2 Deals for Blue Nokia 2680 Slide Phone UK (http://blog.phoneslimited.co.uk/files/2009/03/2680-blue-real.jpg) and rotated. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Brand/Organisational logo - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Episode1165.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Comic strip art - More information needed to confirm self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Music Video - Source listed in file history is NOT uploader Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ultrasonic Welding Al to Ta Thin films (HotWorkThermosonic Bonding).pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly a magazine article - I see no indication that this is public domain as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Blnguyen winter.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a photogrpah of a soft toy- Concern is design copyright in the soft toy shown Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd say this is nonsense unless photos of statues are also banned YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 02:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- As with the museum pics up top, I can't see that there is a derivative work issue here since the object depicted is plainly not an artwork or work of artistic craftsmanship. And note that Commons has pictures of Steiff teddy bears. See again commons:Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps a bridge too far Sfan00. Similarly to Angus I feel that this has stepped beyond the bounds of copyrightable material. Better focus though please YM ;-) Peripitus (Talk) 11:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AayeshPoster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Poster artwork - No clear indication uploader is the designer mentioned Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:52, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:My Profile Picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This collage is not eligible for the public domain, since the uploader did not create each individual image used in it; portions can be found at http://www.formula1.com/gallery/race/2006/, marked "© 1999-2010". Used only on one userpage (where it is impermissible due to nonfree portions), and not usable anywhere within the encyclopedia. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.