Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 27 October 29 >

October 28[edit]

File:Anujcar.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anujcar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Anuj sharma poster 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)
File:Anuj khwaab poster 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)
File:Anuj khwaab poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)
File:Anuj pink.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)
File:ANNU.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)
File:Anuj1111111111111111111211111.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs)
  • A mix of "self" made "posters" and other items. All are claimed as "self" but I am not sure - on the other hand the collages and "posters" may well have been created by the upoader, but the underlying images may not have been. Many were taken form nagmanoj2's photostream at Flickr. (example anuj's KHWAAB poster 7 upped at Flckr March 8, 2010 - all rights reserved, File:Anuj sharma poster 3.jpg upped here March 9, 2010 as {{PD-self}}) Most are unused, some have no source or author information. One also contains a drawing. Other images have been deleted for various reason and in 2008 the user was warned about uploading images "without sources and/or copyright information." Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:ANZACAT.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANZACAT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Artofdying21.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artofdying21.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:AOD logo name.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs)
  • Unused images. A promo shot and a logo. Based on the users other uploads these are most likely not really {{PD-self}} as they claim. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Slaven Musa.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slaven Musa.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Vlado Zadro.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vlado Zadro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Mate Dragičević.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mate Dragičević.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Vernes Selimović.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vernes Selimović.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Jimmy bulus (2).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jimmy bulus (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Idrissa laouali.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Idrissa laouali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Alassane.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alassane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Lassina karim konate.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lassina karim konate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Issoufou alhassane.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Issoufou alhassane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Kamilou.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamilou.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Dela sacko.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dela sacko.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Koffi dan kowa - 18.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koffi dan kowa - 18.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Chikhoto.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chikhoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Kader.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kader.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Shamweel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shamweel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:M. aničić.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:M. aničić.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Melher.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melher.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Džidić.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Džidić.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Salcinovic.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salcinovic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Vjeran simunić.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vjeran simunić.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Rabo saminou.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabo saminou.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Werleman.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werleman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Barthelemy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barthelemy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Djikoloum.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djikoloum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is likely a copyvio, there is no evidence to support the uploaders claim to own the copyright. The uploader has claimed copyright of a diverse number of lo-res images, all are likely copyvios most likely taken from an unknown website. E. Fokker (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Jaani Dushman 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaani Dushman 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • An official film poster tagged with free licenses. Not likely that the uploader is the copyright holder or an authorised representative thereof. Nyttend (talk) 03:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Cheez-It-Box-Small.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use, ineligible for deletion in this venue. files for deletion is that way. — ξxplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheez-It-Box-Small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

i'm not sure why this is here. it's a picture that i took myself, and follows the guidelines for product images. the file replaced one uploaded by emerson7, so it might have been put up for deletion because of that.

  • Evan-Amos
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The image actually was tagged with {{dfu}} on October 28 (See this) and it was than tagged as unused by a bot (see this) and than removed by the same bot later the same day and *then* the rest of the tags were removed October 31. (see this dif). I actually would concur with the {{dfu}} tag so I am not sure why the bot removed it causing another bot to post here saying to tag it as dfu. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Emperor of Exmoor.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - This is not a "possibly unfree image" but an unfree image for sure. Please take it to Images for Deletion if one wants to delete this image.

File:Emperor of Exmoor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Invalid licence: article is not about the Daily Mail or photographer JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 10:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Understanding from "article or issue in question" - "issue" only means copy of publication, not subject of photo. However, from directly from WP:Non-free_content, these terms all seem satisfied:
1. No free equivalent. - Green tickY
2. Respect for commercial opportunities. - Use on Wikipedia does not reduce paid opportunities - image has been licensed for use on many newspapers.
3a. Minimal usage. -Green tickY, only one is used.
3b. Minimal extent of use. - Green tickY - low resolution (257x210) is used. Even lower resolution can be used if this is preferred.
4. Previous publication. -Green tickY
5. Content - meets WP standards, is encyclopedic, as it shows this particular deer, the Emperor of Exmoor.
6. Media-specific policy - Free is preferred, non-free is not preferred but may be allowed in some circumstances. Help is requested understanding the valid circumstances.
7. One article minimum. Green tickY
8. Contextual significance. Green tickYImage shows subject of article in its environment, large rack of antlers, beard etc.
9. Restrictions on location. Green tickY - only used in article space, no galleries.
10. Image description page.
10a. Identification of source Green tickY
10b. Copyright tags - ? - this tag may be the incorrect one. Please help select the correct tag, if it is incorrect. Specifically, would either {{Template:Non-free fair use in}} or {{Template:Non-free historic image}} apply?
10c. Name of article is listed. Green tickY Emperor of Exmoor.
--Lexein (talk) 02:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Used in an article about the subject of the image, has a FUR, animal is dead, so no free equivalent can be reasonably obtained.
  • Copyright tag might be better as {{non-free fair use in}}.
  • Circumstances for using this image under fair use are in these sorts of cases: when the subject of the image is deceased, so one cannot take a photo of it, and put it into the article. Since there is no existing image in, or free equivalent available for, the article, it should be fine. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually there seems a fair bit of doubt whether the animal is dead - see Talk:Emperor of Exmoor. In which case the image is not irreplaceable and a free copy could be obtained. Le Deluge (talk) 08:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Kia.Abdullah.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kia.Abdullah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Peter Schlicht.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Schlicht.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Orphaned image that appears to be a studio photo, meaning uploader is not copyright holder. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 14:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Robert william witt.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert william witt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • First, no source or author supplied. Second publicity photos are usually owned by the company promoting this person, which is probably not the uploader.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 14:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Know your Democracy x Place!.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Know your Democracy x Place!.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Know your Place.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • One image is signed by it's creator "Debbie Morris" who is not the uploader. I will accept that these may be {{PD-text}}, however both images are Orphaned. Therfore, even if they are I see no reason to keep them. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 16:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Paper Doll album.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paper Doll album.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Perfect Time For A Breakdown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Ajax1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajax1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:CMB AIRPORT.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CMB AIRPORT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • no evidence at [1] that the image has been released into the public domain or is the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Concur. The source also links to photos by Lou Walter Wilson and the images are all marked as "All rights reserved." Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Aspiraf620-3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aspiraf620-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No source is given, but this appears to be a photo that the car company itself would create to adverizing purpose. Note the white floor with sky backgroud. Fair-use is probbly out since it fails "No free equivalent" as someone outther has taken a free equivalent photo of this car. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 17:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Bahia Incident.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - sorry. Without further information compelling its non-copyright status (e.g., who was the author? Might it have been published beforehand?) or whether it comes with a copyright notice in the encyclopedia, we are forced to assume it is not public domain. Uploader has not provided information in two weeks since notification of deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahia Incident.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This image is sources from The Oxford History of the American People, published 1965, meaning this is not a {{pd-self}} and copyrighted. However, it is very possible, that this image is still Public Domain. If the image itself is PD independent of the book, such as if it was drawn by someone else before the book was printed. However, no information as to whom this author would be, if he exists.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 18:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Surely this is in the public domain after 146 years? It could use a crop, though. — ξxplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Bfslogo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Changed to fair use by uploader.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 18:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bfslogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:30th Anniversary Edition.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section. Then remove the edit button.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. Changed to {{PD-textlogo}}--ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 18:37, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:30th Anniversary Edition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • derivative work of 30th Anniversary Edition Subaru Legacy wagon. Taking a photo of a copyrighted item doesn’t create a new copyright or release original copyright. Could be changed to fair use. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 18:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cbpgecjlogo.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, file licensed under fair use. — ξxplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cbpgecjlogo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
I have changed this to {{nonfree logo}}.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 20:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:McMichael.Canadian.Art.Collection.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:McMichael.Canadian.Art.Collection.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Maharani Bhavashankari.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maharani Bhavashankari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Highly doubtful that uploader owns the copyright since this is obviously a painting of some kind. Is unused so can't be fair use. My still be PD but no information is given regarding who the painter is. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 20:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Loose Tubes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Changed to fair use by uploader. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 21:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loose Tubes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Uploads by User:Griffiths911[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep File:Bristol Group.JPG and File:Cardiff21982.JPG, delete the rest. — ξxplicit 06:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following images are incorporates:

Most of the uploader's files have been deleted as copyvios; this casts a suspicion on these images and they should be deleted absent robust proof of ownership. Stifle (talk) 08:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here These 2 were definitely taken by Ken (File:Bristol Group.JPG + File:Cardiff21982.JPG), the rest are not free and I'm not sure about the File:Captain MGT Harris.JPG one. Ryan4314 (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted from here to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks--ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 21:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Files uploaded by User:Market Development[edit]

File:Pic-kimani.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pic-kimani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Zero proof of ownership of files and variety of cameras and locations of this user's uploaded media suggests that these are unfree (see also on commons) SFB 21:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_October_28&oldid=1142588733"