Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 15 October 17 >

October 16[edit]

File:Walmart complete.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Kept for now. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walmart complete.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Corporate logo Eeekster (talk) 00:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Logo consists of only text, and is therefore ineligible for copyright. Changing license tag to {{pd-text}}. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree it's pd-text, but delete anyway. Unused, very poor quality. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as pd-text, but list at FFD as unused other than in userspace and low quality. Stifle (talk) 08:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Herbert E Abrams - self portrait.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbert E Abrams - self portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Copyright most likely owned by the painter Eeekster (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Ami cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ami cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • journal cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Amorantotkdclub.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amorantotkdclub.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • club logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:BOSS Logo 2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BOSS Logo 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Chathukulam.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chathukulam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • low quality image, bad cropping (upper right corner) makes it appear this was taken from another source - not provided Skier Dude (talk 05:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:JCHS Logo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JCHS Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:James campbell HS logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:James campbell HS logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Let it ensemble you.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Let it ensemble you.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • appears to be unused album cover; no source to verify (c) status Skier Dude (talk 05:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:L'Amore Medico 5083435239 8d76280596 o.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Now that information has been added, linking to LOC records, we can all be happy. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Amore Medico 5083435239 8d76280596 o.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • PD-US is applied, and on the source page, the information regarding the date is '[no date recorded on caption card]'. ([1]). So I don't think we can verify the date. Acather96 (talk) 07:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, an image of an opera premier from 1914 with a fat guy that died in 1918, and the Library of Congress listing it as "between ca. 1910 and ca. 1915", it should be a no brainer. My rule for myself is always: think twice, then tag just once". --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 07:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is the Library of Congress listing online, because I can't see any date information at all from the source you have provided. Could have missed something though. Acather96 (talk) 07:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Almirante padilla class frigate.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Almirante padilla class frigate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:S28pijao.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:S28pijao.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Sx506.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sx506.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Gloria1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloria1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Kfir col 8.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kfir col 8.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Fortisip.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fortisip.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Clearly product artwork and previous PUI marked this as fair-use Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Romeo_and_Juliet_Posters.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romeo and Juliet Posters.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Promotional posters, more information needed to justify self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:A1not.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A1not.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Sourced to the uploader and released under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, however the subject of the image is a book, and I doubt the uploader holds the copyright. Acather96 (talk) 17:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The uploader is a copyright holder in this image; there is a degree of creative composition etc - it's not just a straightforward picture of the front of the book. All the same the use of the book cover design is not incidental or trivial, so the image does need a fair use justification for that book cover. We don't do a good job of telling uploaders what to do when there is more than one copyright interest in an image. Thparkth (talk) 21:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:NancyHopkins 01.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NancyHopkins 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Need to establish that copyright was not renewed. Can't be claimed under fair use as currently unused. (Contributor not directly notified, as is aware of and watching CCI.) Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: also nominated for deletion on other grounds here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Wunderground 0504 thumb.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wunderground 0504 thumb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Copyrighted thumbnail image of a 2008 newspaper. No evidence that uploader is the copyright holder. GrapedApe (talk) 19:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Blackberry torch.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight 0001 20:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackberry torch.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:RodriguezwithF15.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RodriguezwithF15.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:IraqiMiG-23.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IraqiMiG-23.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Tankbattle2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tankbattle2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Kuwaitcityinvaded.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kuwaitcityinvaded.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Navalmine.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navalmine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Iraq safwan-surrender91.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iraq safwan-surrender91.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:GuardingM2A2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuardingM2A2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_October_16&oldid=1073715191"