Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 November 25
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
November 25[edit]
File:SI-PassingOutParade.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SI-PassingOutParade.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source website does not say what is the license for the image. Indian government's websites are not in public domain or CC-SA yet and this source site might also be following the copyright reserved policy. Sreejith K (talk) 04:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:HighWycombestation.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HighWycombestation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: source clearly shows image is copyright. There is no evidence of permission from the copyright holder noted on the source or that there is any relationship between him and the uploader, so the licence appears to be false. ww2censor (talk) 06:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Chiltern train at Marylebone.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: image source in no longer online but using archive.org some content can be found and this page indicates that the site content was copyright. Uploader's claim of a free licence appears to be false. ww2censor (talk) 06:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Rocks around ramanagaram small.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Web resolution. Possibly taken from some website. Sreejith K (talk) 06:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Kristen Alderson 1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kristen Alderson 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Upload by new account claiming that it's their own work and giving it public domain. However, considering it's a picture of her at the Emmy's I find it a bit suspicious. Falcon8765 (TALK) 06:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Farah Fath 1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Farah Fath 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Upload by new user with a bunch of other pics, claiming ownership but not providing any proof Falcon8765 (TALK) 07:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Avenged-sevenfold-stage-uproar.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Uploader claims to be the author but this web page shows the identical resolution images where there is no evidence of any connection between the image and the uploader. Licence is likely false as there is also no metadata. On the bottom of the source page there is a Creative Commons non-commercial licence link which is not compatible with this wiki. ww2censor (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Magda.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Magda.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image permission given is "For Wikipedia? Yeah, go for it, you can steal one from my page : )" - I don't think this is sufficient to imply / impute that permission has been given for the image to be licensed as free content under a Creative Commons license. Ajbpearce (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Courtyard shot.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; no evidence for deletion. After Midnight 0001 05:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Courtyard shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The other files uploaded by this user are apparently copied off University of Minnesota websites, and this one is claimed as self-made, but this and the other more recent files uploaded by the use rather looks to be copied off a website as well. —innotata 20:12, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:1st hallway.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; no evidence for deletion. After Midnight 0001 05:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1st hallway.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The other files uploaded by this user are apparently copied off University of Minnesota websites, and this one and the other more recent files uploaded by the user is claimed as self-made, but rather look to be copied off a website as well. —innotata 20:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Lab shot.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; no evidence for deletion. After Midnight 0001 05:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lab shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The other files uploaded by this user are apparently copied off University of Minnesota websites, and this one and the other more recent files uploaded by the user is claimed as self-made, but rather look to be copied off a website as well. —innotata 20:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Murphy lib aisle.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; no evidence for deletion. After Midnight 0001 05:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Murphy lib aisle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The other files uploaded by this user are apparently copied off University of Minnesota websites, and this one and the other more recent files uploaded by the user is claimed as self-made, but rather look to be copied off a website as well. —innotata 20:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.