Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 July 6

< July 5	July 7 >

July 6[edit]

File:Prowl-rid.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prowl-rid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Toy design - so I m querying if this can be GFDL as claimed? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Why me (Job) net.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Why me (Job) net.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is an image of a 2001 painting, for which copyright almost certainly resides with the artist, though i do not know the detail of Iceland's laws. No permission has been offered, and the source is incorrectly characterised as "self-made". Contributor has a track record of image upload problems: see User talk:Klettur. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:07, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader was notified on 6 July. Still no response. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:20 no more kvota 99.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20 no more kvota 99.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

1999 painting. As above. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2 albert gudmundsson.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2 albert gudmundsson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

1983 painting. As above. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Steinn steinarr1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steinn steinarr1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Undated painting, but recent. As above. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Trichy IT Park Elcot Bldg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trichy IT Park Elcot Bldg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be scanned from a printed source. Eeekster (talk) 06:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Singer Hill.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singer Hill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Listed as self-made with a creation date of the upload date. Perhaps I am being unfairly suspicious but the Exif data shows this image was made with a medium format Digital back-a serious professional studio camera-and given the uploader's edits, the content of the image page, I cannot see evidence that the original creator of this image and the uploader are the same person. Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Antiskeptic Promo Shot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. Uploader is advised to pursue the instructions listed at the donating copyrighted materials page. — ξ ^xplicit 01:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antiskeptic Promo Shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Taken from a freely licensed flickr image but, given that I can see a version of this image on the net from 2008, and the lack of provenance on flickr, I think that the image does not belong to the flickr uploader. Peripitus (Talk) 12:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm from one of the record labels behind Antiskeptic (El Shaddai Records), and we uploaded that image to flickr under a creative commons license for advertising & use on wikipedia (we have rights to the original image). Is there something more I need to do to make sure this image isn't removed? --Zombiepig (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The best way is to send an email, from the record companies system, to permissions-en‐at‐wikimedia.org (see Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries) noting this. This can then be permanently recorded against the related files (on Wikimedia) - Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:To speak of wolves.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. Uploader is advised to pursue the instructions listed at the donating copyrighted materials page. — ξ ^xplicit 01:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:To speak of wolves.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Taken from a freely licensed flickr image but given the existance of other versions on the net that predate this (flickr) upload and the lack of provenance on flickr, I think that the image does not belong to the flickr uploader. Peripitus (Talk) 12:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm from one of the record labels behind Antiskeptic (El Shaddai Records), and we uploaded that image to flickr under a creative commons license for advertising & use on wikipedia (we have rights to the original image). Is there something more I need to do to make sure this image isn't removed? --Zombiepig (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:House vs hurricane.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete for lacking evidence of permission. Uploader is advised to pursue the instructions listed at the donating copyrighted materials page. — ξ ^xplicit 01:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:House vs hurricane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Taken from a freely licensed flickr image but given the existance of other versions on the net that predate this (flickr) upload and the lack of provenance on flickr, I think that the image does not belong to the flickr uploader. Peripitus (Talk) 12:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm from one of the record labels behind Antiskeptic (El Shaddai Records), and we uploaded that image to flickr under a creative commons license for advertising & use on wikipedia (we have rights to the original image). Is there something more I need to do to make sure this image isn't removed? --Zombiepig (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cmulhs logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cmulhs logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is the logo for a university. The GFDL tag is obviously made up, but it could possibly be PD by age if the creative elements date back to 1910. B (talk) 15:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chandon_California_Brut_sparkling_wine.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. This does appear to be a nice example of de minimins usage. — ξ ^xplicit 01:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chandon California Brut sparkling wine.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of logo - De minimins usage ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LokomotivStadion.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LokomotivStadion.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

see http://www.fc-tom.ru/news/1144/ for a 2007 publication, this image is not own work but copied from somewhere. --Martin H. (talk) 17:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Toby-sign-mesa1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toby-sign-mesa1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a picture of a sign on a building - The notes indicate the image was taken in the US - Does FOP Apply to signs? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.