Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 July 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< July 10 July 12 >

July 11[edit]

File:Galena Paw.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galena Paw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Somebody's logo with no source specified. Eeekster (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Kegerator-mm.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kegerator-mm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Inconsistent tags (user-created public domain AND fair use?); image appears at [1] and hence seems unlikely to be user-created; image is obviously replaceable, so fair use doesn't fly either. Zetawoof(ζ) 05:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:PrinciplesCoops1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PrinciplesCoops1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Book cover. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 13:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:SSFC Site.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSFC Site.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Screenshot of a website. No evidence it is freely licensed. J Milburn (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:BressiRanch.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BressiRanch.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Summary says: "Author: Rob Hart, fair use, no restrictions." Is uploader Rob Hart? Why write "fair use"? I doubt it is own work. MGA73 (talk) 15:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Outdoor-unit.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Outdoor-unit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No copyright given, uploader claims in the comments that it's his own work, which it clearly isn't Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Acsplit.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acsplit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Portrait of Ruhollah Khomeini.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Ruhollah Khomeini.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • I'm limited to Google Translate on the source site, but I cannot find anything anywhere on the site that corroborates the uploader's claim of GFDL. User is not responding to requests about various sources. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, currently not verifiable licensing. feydey (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per nom. Nsk92 (talk) 15:48, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:2011QatarMap.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by R'n'B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011QatarMap.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Author is given as "Andriyko_UA" which doesn't match the uploader's username. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:59, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Ilirska Bistrica COA.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilirska Bistrica COA.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • the same then can be said for File:Flag of Koper.gif and for File:CoA of Koper.gif which are found in the Koper article so if you are going to delete this then you can also delete that two files.Mrwho00tm (talk) 19:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Ilirska bistrica flag.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilirska bistrica flag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

there again is no reason for it to be deleted, ofcourse this may be wrong if you want to damage wikipedia articles, which i highly doubt someone would want to do so here. ofcourse if you say that this should be deleted, then same be said for File:Flag of Koper.gif and for File:CoA of Koper.gif which are found in the Koper article so if you are going to delete this then you can also delete that two files.Mrwho00tm (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Izolaflag.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Izolaflag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

there is no reason for this to be deleted.Mrwho00tm (talk) 19:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • if this will be deleted then so should be the Coat of arms of Koper and the flag be because those two are also illegal from your point of view.Mrwho00tm (talk) 20:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Operacja Zagiel 94 logo on t-shirt.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Operacja Zagiel 94 logo on t-shirt.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • It is a logo and logos are copyrighted unless they are PD-ineligible, PD-old og author releases them or gives a permission. MGA73 (talk) 20:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do you suggest a way for the logo to be used or will it just be deleted? I think the file adds importance to the page Ertly (talk) 04:11, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Probably delete. If the ship in the logo originally came from material that is PD then the rest might be PD-ineligible. Otherwise we could keep it if the copyright holder gave a permission. --MGA73 (talk) 09:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Rock-hill-city-hall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rock-hill-city-hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:WestOrangeCoveMascot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, erring on the side of caution. — ξxplicit 01:19, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WestOrangeCoveMascot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a logo and as far as I can tell it is from 1977 and therefore not PD-old. So I think we need a permission to keep this. MGA73 (talk) 21:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Arguments was placed on File talk:WestOrangeCoveMascot.jpg that "...since it was designed using public funding and citizen opinion ...it was put into Public Domain in 1977..." (see full argument on talk page). I do not know that law so I can not tell if it is true. --MGA73 (talk) 09:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then I fail to see how this issue can be resolved. If it is of your belief that I used this image without appropriate permission, you may contact the WO-CCISD Public Information Office. The Liasion Officer's contact information can be found at http://www.woccisd.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by WOS2014 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Yalavarti Anjaneya Shastry.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yalavarti Anjaneya Shastry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Poster or cover of a book? MGA73 (talk) 22:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_July_11&oldid=1078938524"