Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 7

< January 6	January 8 >

January 7[edit]

File:PsyborgCorpBand.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PsyborgCorpBand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Promotional image of a notable band. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PsyborgCorp.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PsyborgCorp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TDK small logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TDK small logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Corporate logo; no source or metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as official logo Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MCB Logo Final 08.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MCB Logo Final 08.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Corporate logo; no source or metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as official logo Skier Dude (talk) 05:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MCB Logo Final 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MCB Logo Final 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Corporate logo; no source or metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as official logo Skier Dude (talk) 05:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lucky 7 cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucky 7 cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source or metadata; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that showing the cover of a book is like stating its title, but the byzantine copyright regulations are not clear to me on this -- if uploading a different form that credits its source and has no profit motive violates copyright, then I need to delete all the scans of the bookcovers. Thanks for your help. Cohee (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HRF cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HRF cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carpenter book cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carpenter book cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FADP cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FADP cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hole in Texas.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hole in Texas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sole Survivor dustcover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sole Survivor dustcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wooden Nickel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooden Nickel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Courting Saskatchewan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Courting Saskatchewan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gods Bedfellows.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gods Bedfellows.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is author, publishing company, or (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OmniWeb.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep; the file is tagged as non-free. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:OmniWeb.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Only the backend(webkit) is LGPL the rest is proprietary. So isn't the correct license here {{non-free logo}} or {{non-free computer icon}}? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone added a rational and removed the license i added {{non-free computer icon}} so now it really is non-free so i guess discussion closed.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stjoessnowy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep; apparently it does. See here -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stjoessnowy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Work of architecure in US - Does FOP apply? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Designerz central cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Designerz central cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image looks like a magazine cover and has no OTRS ticket. No way this could be a free image. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gore-freezing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gore-freezing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Listed as both CC-SA-3.0, "Free to use" and sourced to a website that says "All rights reserved." Uploader can't give a clear explanation of where it came from. Hipocrite (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes i did, however delete it to stop the confusion. --mark nutley (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, in fact, you did not. The original upload originates from neoconnews.com (a copy of which you found mirrored on chemicallygreen.com). However, the new image you uploaded under the same name and replaced the old one with does not originate from either of those two websites. Since original uploader requests deletion, please delete. Viriditas (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I just saw a request from the original uploader that this image be deleted since there seems to be some confusion over the copyright status of the image. Given this any further discussion on this point would seem to be moot. Please speedily delete the image per the request from the "owner" since the image in question has not been used for any purpose in article space. --GoRight (talk) 14:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete as above and as orphan (assuming a fair use claim were to be advanced). Jack Merridew 19:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cathedral dome.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathedral dome.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

PD-self - erm... Clearly shows an artwork - Possibly PD-OLD? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not hold the copyright to the artwork (the Dome with frescoes) that the photograph depicts. I hold copyright to the Photograph that DEPICTS the artwork. The photograph itself is not an artwork. If I take picture of St. Peter's Basilica, do I have to say that its a work of Gian Lorenzo Bernini?No, its my work.--Satt 2 (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader appears to be correct here, assuming that indeed this is his own photograph. The architecture and frescoes depicted are clearly PD-old, while the photograph attracts its own copyright (since it's not 2D, it doesn't fall under the PD-art rules), so he can validly license them as his own work. Satt 2, for the sake of clarity and encyclopedic usefulness, could you perhaps specify what building this actually is? (same for the other parallel case below). Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio This photograph of a 3-D artwork File:Cathedral_dome.jpg is this image [1] on flickr by earthmagnified. It does not have either of the two creative commons licenses necessary for use on wikipedia. Images of the dome from the Church of the Gesu do exist on commons, eg File:Cupola Baciccia Gesu.jpg. Obviously Satt 2 did not take this photograph. Mathsci (talk) 14:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Itamar Simonson.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Itamar Simonson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No information on licensing is given, image is taken from Simonson's faculty page: https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/facultyprofiles/biomain.asp?id=72739009 Fences&Windows 20:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Baroque Fresco Ceiling.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baroque Fresco Ceiling.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Not PD-self - Clearly artowrk Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So what that the photographs depict an artwork? If I take a picture of the Capitol Rotunda, should I list the architect of the Capitol building as a copyright holder? The copyright that I am specifying refers to the PHOTOGRAPH that I took, rather than what the photograph depicts.--Satt 2 (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio The image is of a 3-dimensional artwork. This image File:Baroque Fresco Ceiling.jpg is taken from here [2]. It shows Jupiter Crowning the Victorious Hero by Pietro da Cortona in the Sala di Giove (the Medici throneroom), in the Palazzo Pitti in Florence. (I found it by looking for the exact dimensions.) Obviously Satt 2 did not take this photograph. Mathsci (talk) 14:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for finding this. here is the source webpage, showing the date of the posting. Uploader now blocked as a repeat copyright offender. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bullet train.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bullet train.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

2 tineye matches - Unlikely to by uploader given it's a computer rendering Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment All other images uploaded by this user so far have been copyright violations taken from random websites. Tried to find this image on Google but was unsuccessful. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.