Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
January 6[edit]
File:Shah baleeghuddin Addressing Seerat Jalsa013.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No evidence provided that this image is, in fact, "free use". Woogee (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shah Baleeghuddin with President of China029.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Image-Ibtehaj Mag Photo.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Magazine cover, unlikely that the uploader is the copyright owner Woogee (talk) 00:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SB Military Kakool007.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SB Military Kakool007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shah Baleeghuddin with Ghous Ali Sha.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shah Baleeghuddin - Political & Social interactions062.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shah baleeghuddin Visit to Military academy Kakool002.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Great Leader Comrade Kim Jong Il (122).jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Contains an image copyright tag intended for Wikipedia screenshots, even though it isn't a Wikipedia screenshot. No other copyright information is given. Source is given as being from knowledgerush.com, which is principally a Wikipedia mirror, and which seems to have mirrored this image from us (note filename). In any case, no creator details or truthful copyright terms are known. — Gavia immer (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SBU Addressing Seerat Meet.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ali Cover copy.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ali Cover copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover; unlikely uploader is artist or studio/ (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Primitiv Matrix Musik.ogg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Primitiv Matrix Musik.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- article caption states "Audio excerpt from "Primitiv Matrix Musik" released on Demonbag W8N in 1998 including a small overture and the first five matrix figures' - if this is correct, this would not be CC3.0 Skier Dude (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- uploader is not (c) holder but (c) holder gave (verbal) permission to use the excerpt on Wikipedia, confirmation of this can be produced if necessary Die Luzi (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:RCM&FM p32.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RCM&FM p32.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- scan of book pages, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- uploader is not (c) holder but (c) holder gave (verbal) permission to use scan on Wikipedia, confirmation of this can be produced if necessary Die Luzi (talk) 10:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:RCM&FM p58.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RCM&FM p58.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- scan of book pages, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- uploader is not (c) holder but (c) holder gave (verbal) permission to use scan on Wikipedia, confirmation of this can be produced if necessary Die Luzi (talk) 11:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Radical Computer Music.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Radical Computer Music.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- scan of book cover, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- uploader is not (c) holder but (c) holder gave (verbal) permission to use scan on Wikipedia, confirmation of this can be produced if necessary Die Luzi (talk) 11:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Maximovlorenzowikiart.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Maximovlorenzowikiart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- compilation of 6 images sourced to "Maximo V. Lorenzo" - no sources provided. Unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Pocket-04.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pocket-04.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- claims to be "official photo"- no source provided, if "official" unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PCC LOGO 1000.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PCC LOGO 1000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- corporate/group logo; source given as "Bruce McNeel" (no link); if legit, no proof was released under CC3.0; if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 07:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Imagen 2.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Imagen 2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claims to be promotional photo from artist; no source or metadata; if is promotional material, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:HiromiBrain.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HiromiBrain.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Album cover; source = "Telarc" (no link), unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:V112.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PeterSymonds (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:V112.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Incorrect license the software is licensed under WTOF PUBLIC LICENSE not LGPL IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Copy of the license i uploaded to google docs (original location is offline 404error)--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Leith FM logo.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Leith FM logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- radio station logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 07:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Josh Crutchley crossover.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Source states "Welcome to Josh Crutchley website. Have fun looking at the website and my pictures. I hold the copyright on all pictures and you can't copy then without my permission. JoshCruchley.com and Wikiapedia Username JoshCrutchley has my Full Permission to use images of him self and to display and use for the right of Basketball, not to sell or make money from but only merly to use for his only personal use for his personal website and the Wikiapedia Artrical. If your copy my pictures without my permission" - restrictions make this unusable here Skier Dude (talk) 07:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged as {{non-free with permission}}--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged as CSD F3--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 21:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dr Kerry Spackman.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dr Kerry Spackman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Doubtful that Colman Getty Images released this for use under Creative Commons, and doubtful that the uploader is a representative of Colman Getty ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I am from Colman Getty and we have full rights to this image. What further information do we need to add to confirm that we have full rights to the image to prevent any future disputes? --Neenzan (talk) 12:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:DALEK.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DALEK.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of copyrighted work of craftsmanship. Freedom of panorama does not arise as the item is not on permanent display. Stifle (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This photograph was taken by me (Zir) in BBC Television Centre Stage 6 Reception and and is my copyright ©. It was uploaded to Wikipedia by me on 20th January 2009.
- The © in its description refers to the word Dalek (and not the image) which was coined by Terry Nation and which I believe the BBC use with the permission of Terry Nation's estate.Zir (talk) 23:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A photograph of a copyrighted 3D design is considered a derivative. As such, it cannot be released under a free license. — Edokter • Talk • 23:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It is works of artistic craftsmanship to which freedom of panorama provisions apply, not merely craftsmanship, and the subject is not an object of that type (see the examples at commons:commons:freedom of panorama#UK). As regards both freedom of panorama and derivative works, it's not immediately obvious to me what it is that makes this image significantly different from commons:File:Nissan Urge Concept Car.jpg or commons:File:Renault Egeus concept car profile-2006-07-21.jpg. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per analysis and examples given by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 06:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I see it's been replaced by File:Daleks appearence.jpg on Dalek which would seem to be one step worse, as it's a screen-grab of a © BBC image. If my photo is removed then you will probably have to remove every Tardis and many police box images, as these are certainly © BBC. Worra can of worms! Zir (talk) 08:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- TARDIS, probably, unless it's permanently installed in a public place. Police box, no, as it's a utilitarian object and can't attract a copyright. Stifle (talk) 10:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The TARDIS is trademarked, not copyrighted. Also, this isn't e keep/delete discussion; this process is only to established this image's copyright status. — Edokter • Talk • 13:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteI see now that freedom of panoramain the United States (amended 12:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)) only applies to integral artworks, not free-standing ones,[1]so it is a non-free file. As the file is currently unused, it should be deleted as an unused, non-free file. However, if the licence is changed to fair-use and it is used, then it would be a keep.DrKiernan (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]- If marked fair-use, we have two fair-use images, in which case preference should be given to the original. — Edokter • Talk • 13:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, if it's a choice between two fair-use images (this file and File:Daleks appearence.jpg), I prefer the latter too. DrKiernan (talk) 13:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If marked fair-use, we have two fair-use images, in which case preference should be given to the original. — Edokter • Talk • 13:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—while I think that this image probably is free per the examples that Angusmclellan (talk · contribs) gave, surely there is a permanently-situated Dalek somewhere (Cardiff? Doctor Who Exhibition?) which can be photographed to avoid the hassle? ╟─TreasuryTag►quaestor─╢ 22:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How permanent is "permanent" in this context? Doctor Who exhibitions come and go. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Doctor Who Museum in Cardiff is permanent, surely? ╟─TreasuryTag►Woolsack─╢ 07:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The law says that freedom of panorama applies when the artwork is embedded in the structure of the building, and can only be removed by damaging or altering the work. DrKiernan (talk) 08:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No, that's the United States law. Commons explicitly notes that, with regards to the UK, "it is acceptable to upload to Commons not only photographs of public buildings and sculptures but also works of artistic craftsmanship which are on permanent public display in museums, galleries and exhibitions which are open to the public," (my emphasis). ╟─TreasuryTag►stannator─╢ 11:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The law says that freedom of panorama applies when the artwork is embedded in the structure of the building, and can only be removed by damaging or altering the work. DrKiernan (talk) 08:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Doctor Who Museum in Cardiff is permanent, surely? ╟─TreasuryTag►Woolsack─╢ 07:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:A Cover Afrique.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:A Cover Afrique.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- reason this image is non-free
On the Wikipedia page Didier Ruef, I am the author of the picture published in the book which I am also the author. I have the full copyright. What sjhall I do to avoid any deletion of the picture?
By the way, somebody deleted on the page two pictures on books which I am the author. I am trying now to resettle the page and takes me lots of useless time.
Please tell me what I shoud write in the file in order to avoid this kind of problem. My email: [email protected]
Thanks in advance.
Didier Ruef —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvanuche (talk • contribs) 14:53, 6 January 2010
- The book is probably copyrighted, and the copyright is held by your publisher (unless you retained the rights). That means you cannot (re-)release the cover under a free licence. You should tag the image with {{Non-free book cover}} instead. — Edokter • Talk • 23:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Circ061797.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, copyvio. http://www.mtv.com/music/artist/soundgarden/artist.jhtml suggests copyright lies with A&M Records. Amalthea 23:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Circ061797.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It can't be own work by uploader: resolution is low, black & white, and the band is clearly standing for a press photo. The band despicted disbanded in 1997, as told by the caption in the article. Even more, I have a magazine from a decade ago that uses this very same image as a poster (it was surely a reuse of a photo took from some other magazine, but it serves to deny the "own work" claim). MBelgrano (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as when the user uploaded it, he provided an external link in the edit summary. Obviously a copyvio. Nymf talk/contr. 14:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Definite copyvio tagged CSD F9--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 21:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:SM City Manila.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SM City Manila.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly logo ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- On the other hand its a permanent fixture on a public building maybe its freedom of panorama but at the very least its a trademark logo.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.