Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 13
| < January 12 | January 14 > |
|---|
January 13
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IMG 3405.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source site use NC clause in Creative Commons licensing. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No source given (other than self) - Skeptical of a self claim given uploaders talk page Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Skeptical as to self claim - given uploaders talk page Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Skeptical of self claim given uploaders talk page Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bowin P4 Formula Ford.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Skeptical about self-claim - No sourcing information Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- corporate logo; no source or metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 07:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 20:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- corporate logo; no source or metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 07:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 20:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Francisnewtonsouza.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- no source; metadata date =12/29/09 & subject died in 2002; likely uploader took picture of existent picture Skier Dude (talk) 07:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Drhomibhabha.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- no source; metadata date =12/29/09 & subject died in 1966; likely uploader took picture of existent picture Skier Dude (talk) 07:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Letterofdrambedkar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- metadata date = 12/29/09; author died 1956; no source (either website or were this document actually resides); possibly PD, but without source it's not possible to determine correct license Skier Dude (talk) 07:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Redhornmodel.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Despite thier being no dispute that this is the uploader's own photo, the primary subject of the image is a copyright model/toy design. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BrettMyers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- source url states all rights reserved ccwaters (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The image was listed as CC-BY when I originally uploaded it; I don't have any control over whether the owner of the photo decides to change the rights after the fact. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe you. No accusations are directed towards you. :) ccwaters (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The image was listed as CC-BY when I originally uploaded it; I don't have any control over whether the owner of the photo decides to change the rights after the fact. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to say that has the looks of a professional photo. I fear the original uploader may have labeled it CC-BY, but I dunno if that person had such a license. Staxringold talkcontribs 14:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Wrong venue. This would be for Wikipedia:Files for deletion. My reading of policy would be that editors can nominate this image as frequently as they wish at FFD if they believe it doesn't comply in every respect with Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. I believe the Enforcement section there makes this clear. Presumably there's a point at which one editor repeatedly nominating an image would be engaging in tendentious behaviour but that's another story. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Goatse.fr homepage.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Fair-use rationale as given:
"The image is to be used as a website screenshot in the infobox for Goatse.cx. This serves two purposes: for one, it helps as a visual aid to the layout of the website; and secondly it illustrates the image in a way that article text cannot in an article that is effectively about the image. The fact of this file is the subject of the article of use effectively creates an almost undeniable proof of "critical commentary"."
Clearly, this fair-use rationale was written as a gaming of WP:NOTCENSORED. This rationale would not hold up in court. The rationale is essentially wikilawyering around the fact that this is not a fair-use image but, as common, many trolls would like to see it included. Simply stated, it's better to delete this just like Brian Peppers. ScienceApologist (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This listing is a run-around our normal dispute resolution processes, and should be therefore delisted. Sceptre (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Isn't this page for files where we're not sure if it's free or not? This file clearly states it's not free, but fair use rationalse is given. Shoudldn't this be listed in the files for deletion? PS There was a file for deletion not that long ago and the result was to keep it. No new reason for deletion was given by the nominator. Jolly Ω Janner 22:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.