Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 11
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < January 10 | January 12 > |
|---|
January 11[edit]
File:Fuller3.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fuller3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the author gives this photo for free Wandering Courier (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Camino.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Camino.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is this free or fair use? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Acid3detailMidori0.1.9.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Acid3detailMidori0.1.9.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is it free or fair use? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Growl Preferences.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; this is an image of free software. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Growl Preferences.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is it free or is it fair use? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a tag for this situation {{conflicted-license}} . Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Scrap-MTV-logo.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Scrap-MTV-logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is it free or is it fair use? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Webmin1420.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Webmin1420.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is it free or is it fair use? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Google-chrome-3.0.183.1-linux.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it free or is it fair use? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Acid3detailSafari4.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Acid3detailSafari4.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is it free or is it fair use? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not fair use now commons close--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 11:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Nautilus-2.24.1-ubuntu.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; the ubuntu OS and program Nautilus are free software. -FASTILY (TALK) 02:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nautilus-2.24.1-ubuntu.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is it free or not? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 11:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Pink Floyd end of Live 8.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Screencap of a Mac desktop. The image itself is clearly not free, as can be seen by a simple Google search for "Pink Floyd Live 8" Parrot of Doom 21:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:FingaskRoyalCoatofArms.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FingaskRoyalCoatofArms.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As stated in the summary: Photo created by H. Molchanoff. No proof of permission submitted by User:Rodolph Memphisto (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:24February2007Reeling.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:24February2007Reeling.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As stated in the summary: Photo created by Nick Thackeray. No proof of permission submitted by User:Rodolph Memphisto (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:FingaskFolliesatRoyalMedicalSociety2007.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- As stated in the summary: Photo created by Helen Molchanoff. No proof of permission submitted by User:Rodolph Memphisto (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:FingasFollies2007KateF.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FingasFollies2007KateF.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As stated in the summary: Photo created by Nick Thackeray. No proof of permission submitted by User:Rodolph Memphisto (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Box of Columbiana brand Pandebono.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Skeptical about slef claim- clearly product artwork Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a reproduction of the the images, it's a photo of the product. There are lots of images of cans, bottles, etc. etc. A photo of something is not the same thing as a reproduction of an image itself. The photo is just a legal documentation of boxes of these food products. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's still non-free content Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a reproduction of the the images, it's a photo of the product. There are lots of images of cans, bottles, etc. etc. A photo of something is not the same thing as a reproduction of an image itself. The photo is just a legal documentation of boxes of these food products. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.