Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 15
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 15
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RCA Colortrak 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Flickr source lists a non-commercial licence which is incompatible with the one on the image. Also the image on the screen is probably non-free - a photo of the unit without a copyrighted image should be used Peripitus (Talk) 05:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that there is ongoing discussion on my talk page regarding the status of this image - best to read this before closing the discussion - Peripitus (Talk) 02:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Surul.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- this Pic is scan from book about birbhum district published by Information & Culture Deptt., Govt. of West Bengal. I have this book and it copyrighted to Information & Culture Deptt., Govt. of West Bengal. - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 07:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Maria Goretti A.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The image was created in 1929 rather than 1923 or earlier as the public domain template states is the normal time of release into the public domain in the United States of America. No other reason is given to suggest that it belongs in the public domain. --Frindro (talk) 07:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- keep Wouldn't we just retag with {{PD-Pre1978}}? — BQZip01 — talk 05:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem with doing that is that there is no proof it was first published in the United States. As the painter's name is not provided, it could easily have been published first in Europe or anywhere else in the world.--Frindro (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- My misunderstanding. I thought the claim was based upon thde fact that it was in the U.S. I agree: wee need more info. Otherwise, other appropriate images already exist on the page. — BQZip01 — talk 05:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2vsgglw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Summary reads "Used under fair use", but is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. May possibly be copyrighted artwork. — ξxplicit 09:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:53 daysBand Photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly a promotional image of the band. No metadata and small resolution aren't any help. — ξxplicit 09:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as non-free. — ξxplicit 01:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mentalomegalogo.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- look like a not self-made logo to me --D-Kuru (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mokremlin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- looks like a non-free screenshot of a game to me --D-Kuru (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mopreview.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- looks like a non-free screenshot of a game to me --D-Kuru (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, this is artwork from a mod of the game, depicting an element not found in the original game. It's entirely possible the mod was PD. Not clear from the article if that's the case. There is fair commentary about this these new/mod elements in the article, so it could just be relabeled with a fair use tag to be safe. Pcap ping 21:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bos Dubica Old Picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unknown source, 1930s photo from bosnia-herz, which uses life of author + 70 years. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Possibly the same for File:Bosanska_Dubica_Old.jpg, by the same uploader —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HMAS Arrow wrecked.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photograph apparently dates from 1975, so not clear why {{PD-Australia}} should apply here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The image page on the source site clearly states that the image is © Australian War Memorial - it is not a PD image. I can't see that a decent fair-use rationale could be constructed for us using this - Peripitus (Talk) 02:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.