Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 August 29

< August 28	August 30 >

August 29

File:Auster A 2 45 VL523.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, as this specific image lacks a proper source. — ξ ^xplicit 01:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auster A 2 45 VL523.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Not seeing any reason to assume this is under Crown Copyright. No original source stated. J Milburn (talk) 00:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This very similar photo of the same aircraft, which appears to have been taken as part of the same photo session is credited as "Official Photograph" (i.e Crown Copyright) by the Imperial War Museum. I'm pretty certain that the file is also Crown Copyright, but if it gets deleted then the one on the IWMs website could be substituted.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Heston JC6 A2 45 VL529.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heston JC6 A2 45 VL529.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Not seeing any reason to assume this is under Crown Copyright. Original source not stated. J Milburn (talk) 00:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be identical to this from Flight credited as a Flight photo - not PD.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:"Ultimate Fight Night 22"eventposter.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Ultimate Fight Night 22"eventposter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

While the uploader claims that he created the image, I doubt it. A search on Google images reveals very similar images. The uploaders userpage states 'I'm a sophomore at High school', so I doubt he would be in a position to hold the copyright Acather96 (talk) 04:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Serra1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serra1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source is a commercial website--unlikely to be released to public domain. Chick Bowen 04:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Last supper painting.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Last supper painting.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a derivative work of the painting; the upload summary says nothing indicating the painting itself is under a free license. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK,This is derivative work,but done from the painting dedicated to exact location depicting the place.The place is now common to all visitor,hope the painting can be treated alike architect work done in common place of interest.If this logic suit ,the painting photo can be of use to all. --Md iet (talk) 10:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Commons:FOP#Israel for the relevant issues. There are two questions: is the tomb considered a "public place" (which I think it isn't, if it's owned by the Greek O.C.), and would religious art like this be considered "applied art," which I don't think is the case. It is true, though, that Israel has more liberal laws on photography of public art than almost all countries. But perhaps this can be solved a different way—who painted the painting, and when did they live? Chick Bowen 14:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether it's in a public place, per WP:PD, because "Wikipedia... [is] based in Florid.... the primary law relevant for Wikipedia is that of the United States." The work must be public domain in the US, where FOP doesn't apply for artwork. As such, we must prove this painting is in the public domain lest the Wikimedia Foundation come under suit in the US for copyright infringement. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brig.Gen.TM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brig.Gen.TM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source: Pakistan Army Web Portal - Copyright © 2010. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence that Pakistani army works are automatically public domain. Hekerui (talk) 07:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Safe image.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Safe image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a repost of File:Fellow schaul.jpg, which was uploaded by the same contributor under claim that it was authored by S.Schaul and permitted by J.Schaul; it was deleted for lack of permission after proper notification on August 23rd. If this contributor is the copyright holder; he or she should be able to follow through with the verification procedure...not to mention providing a better quality print. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MKvsDCboxart.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MKvsDCboxart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Video game box-art - Not CC as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sandra dee robinson 23.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandra dee robinson 23.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence this is PD as indicated. No licensing information at original source (subject's website), but presumed copyrighted. The fact that the creator of the photo is tagged as "phootographer" [sic] is dubious and lends credence to the assumption this was taken from somewhere without permission. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Iceberg-armada.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iceberg-armada.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a copyrighted toy. J Milburn (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hnkgorica.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hnkgorica.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be sports club logo; source = RVG HNK Gorica; no indication uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 21:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Berwick1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berwick1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 21:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Berwick2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berwick2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 21:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nairobi.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nairobi.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HowickPlace1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HowickPlace1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HowickPlace2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HowickPlace2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HSBC1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HSBC1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HSBC2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HSBC2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knightsbridge2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knightsbridge2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nairobi2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nairobi2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reiss1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reiss1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reiss2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reiss2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knightsbridge1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knightsbridge1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Purpose = "Illustrative/informational purposes only" = too restrictive for use here; also no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Country Music cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: retagged as no FuR Skier Dude (talk 01:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Country Music cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover used on author page without critical commentary; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cover-Shona-Achey-Jana-Nai.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover-Shona-Achey-Jana-Nai.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

conflicting licensing; originally uploaded as PD - but web link is all (c) material; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cover127.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted as no FuR Skier Dude (talk 01:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover127.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

journal cover; no FuR; used on article without critical commentary (2nd cover on article) Skier Dude (talk 22:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cover Gavi Brittanto.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover Gavi Brittanto.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover used on artist page without any critical commentary ; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CoMoLibrary.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CoMoLibrary.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No FOP in the US for statues; library established in 1959 (rebuilt in 2002), so probably isn't PD even if it was erected during the time of the original construction. —fetch ·comms 22:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cover of IoTW.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted as no FuR Skier Dude (talk 01:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover of IoTW.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover used on author article without critical commentary; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 22:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cover to Rediscovering Cuba A Personal Memoir.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted as no FuR Skier Dude (talk 01:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover to Rediscovering Cuba A Personal Memoir.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover used on author article without any critical commentary; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 23:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:COVER My Words Mean Something.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:COVER My Words Mean Something.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover used on author article without any critical commentary; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 23:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Caramelo's Dream.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caramelo's Dream.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover used on author article without any critical commentary; no FuR; licensed incorrectly as PD Skier Dude (talk 23:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cow Sneezed cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: retagged as no FuRSkier Dude (talk 01:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cow Sneezed cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover used on author article without any critical commentary; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 23:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Curses, Inc Cover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 12 Skier Dude (talk 01:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Curses, Inc Cover.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover used on author article with no critical commentary; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 23:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.