Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 August 10
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
August 10[edit]
File:IQ New Big a.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IQ New Big a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission = "used with permission of photographer" but gives no source or id of photographer, appears to be pro shot (but metadata is photoshop) Skier Dude (talk) 04:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:DREAMINGarizona.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DREAMINGarizona.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission = "used with permission" but no proof of permission from author/artist, preferably through OTRS. Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Islamic violins1.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Islamic violins1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission = "used with permission" but no proof of permission from author/artist, preferably through OTRS. Skier Dude (talk) 05:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Islamic Violins Lumen.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Islamic Violins Lumen.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission = "used with permission" but no proof of permission from author/artist, preferably through OTRS. Skier Dude (talk) 05:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Anamorphose1571.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Anamorphose1571.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission = "CC3.0" but no proof of permission from author/artist, preferably through OTRS. Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:AOI SPREAD IMG 3194.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AOI SPREAD IMG 3194.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission = "CC3.0" but no proof of permission from author/artist, preferably through OTRS. Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:CamelBak Logo.jpeg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The text can be diagonally aligned with all the colors of the rainbow, it would still not meet the threshold of originality. — ξxplicit 00:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CamelBak Logo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I disagree that the arrangement of colors, the arrangement of changing font of the letters (larger font for the C and the K), and the line do not have enough creativity to exist for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't think it's original enough. There are only three types of text/symbols used: large black text, small black text, and a yellow line. We've allowed logos that are far more complicated that this. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Gaga.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gaga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Subject died in 1965, the photo was probably taken 30 or so years before that; no explanation by uploader of how he might own copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. For PD-1923, he would have to have been at most 35; he looks older than that. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Keren13.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Keren13.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image has appeared prior to the WP upload on a copyrighted website at http://www.kogartgaleria.hu/media/ownerimages/2/6/26/keren13.jpg — CactusWriter (talk) 21:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:PestFromGellertHill 4 50mm crop full.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Uploader does not match image owner. If owner granted permission, that is not evident. Victor Engel (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Inspecting the two versions of the file currently on wikipedia closely, it's apparent the version without the watermark was edited from the version with the watermark. That seems to imply the legitimate author did not authorize the nonwatermarked version of the image. Otherwise he would have simply rendered an image without the watermark. The text of the watermark seems to imply that the wish of the author was to have it available on wikipedia (however it says wiki, not wikipedia). However, I can't find anywhere that it is explicit. To complicate matters (perhaps), the author's websites are no longer available online, and he isn't responding to emails. If he does respond, I will have him address this issue. Victor Engel (talk) 22:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have just received word that the photographer has passed away. Victor Engel (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.