Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 April 10
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 10
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, uploader holds copyright. Amalthea 20:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/8801508@N07/4462152531/ feydey (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Uh...copyright notice + replaceable= delete. — BQZip01 — talk 04:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Pointing out that the person watermarked as copyright holder of the images, George Bekris, is offering them for sale at http://www.clustershot.com/Mstrsail under the account name "Mstrsail", which is also the uploader's account name. Thus I'd say there's a high change that the uploader's claim "I created this and release it CC-by-SA" is quite possibly valid, and we shouldn't rush to delete them. I've contacted him, let's hold back here for a bit. Amalthea 16:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have received confirmation that the owner of the clustershot account is the same person as the uploader (and presumably also the holder of the Flickr account of the same name). I have no reason to assume that he doesn't own copyright, so he certainly can release the uploaded versions under CC-by-SA. Amalthea 20:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Richard at work.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Simply taken from a website; the article Richard Broadbridge to which it belongs is also composed using other websites. The uploader also has a history of copyright violations. Simeon (talk) 10:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete same rationale as above. — BQZip01 — talk 04:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
.jpg){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: wrong venue. If it's official then it's certainly unfree and used properly under a claim of fair use. If it isn't, we can't use it anywhere per WP:V and will eventually delete it. Was removed from the article anyways due to doubts about its legitimacy (discussion about that should probably happen at the song article's talk page), so it's currently orphaned and unfree, and marked as such. Amalthea 16:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
- this isn't an official cover or promo cover, it is fan-made and not available from RCA as stated. Alan - talk 15:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to find through google or any other source. Either the explicit source needs to be stated or it needs to go. — BQZip01 — talk 04:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep, I have confirmed that the holder of the clustershot.com account uploaded the images here. Amalthea 20:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Intrepid22.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- apparently high quality photo from commercial photographer. Needs more proof of identity Paul (talk) 18:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete See my first comment on this page. — BQZip01 — talk 04:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lunar city.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is copyright by Pat Rowlings, who is not the uploader. licensed cc-by 3.0, without evidence of the sort. Pat Rowlings is a known illustrator who amongst others illustrated the book Welcome Moon Base. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 23:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Copyrighted and appears to be recent work (not something in the 70s or earlier), so it is likely still under copyright. Given that the uploader claims it is indeed copyrighted and there is no article using it (fails WP:NFCC), it needs to go. — BQZip01 — talk 04:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.